Hello George, I am sure you are a more experienced guy in regards to LENR than I am. Probably a better sailor. If it only comes down to years I am rather close or just a tack ahead (67 years). I am not drawing any conclusions, I just try to evaluate the circumstances. Not always do you need to find a . port, sometimes staying at sea is more advantageous. I do think positive about indications and fair winds is better than no wind. Taking advantage of the wind is the crux. Unfortunately the predictions are very diverse. Now one can decide to be optimistic and I hope my optimistic conclusion is correct but if it is no wind than I just need to wait. Of course if it is a storm I have to ride t out.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Russ George <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Lennart, the old adage ‘any old port in a storm’ is simply not practical. > We’ve been weathering the storm against cold fusion for nigh unto 30 years. > We don’t need any old port/theory, some of us have chosen to just weather > the storm and lumber on. > > > > How Long Have You Been a Sailor ? > > > > All my bloomin' life. > > Me mother was a mermaid. > > Me father was King Neptune. > > I was born on the crest of a wave > > And rocked in the cradle of the deep. > > Seaweed and barnacles are me clothes, > > Every tooth in me head is a marlinspike, > > The hair on me head is hemp, > > Every bone in me body's a spar, > > And when I spits, I spits tar. > > I'se hard, I is, I am, I are. > > > > --- an Old Answer to an Old Question > > > > *From:* Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 8:34 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Patent application by Lundin & Lidgren – nuclear > spallation and resonance > > > > Hello Mats, > > I think this is interesting. I understand the critic from Jones and Russ > but at least it is a theory and it is based on the result of Lugano. Maybe > it was not such a flawed demo just made so it has too many openings for > critic. This also enhances the profile of Rossi. He has support from > scientists with a lot too lose (prestige) if Rossi is a scam as has been > indicated here. I cannot wait for the next report from Rossi and hopefully > a up to date experimental report from Lundin / Lidgren. Sounds to me we are > slowly progressing towaa realization of lenr, keeping essential business > secrets until the last minute before market.)Looks good. > > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > > > > > lenn...@thornros.com > +1 916 436 1899 <(916)%20436-1899> > > > > Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and > enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Mats Lewan <m...@matslewan.se> wrote: > > The LENR patent application by Lundin and Lidgren referenced in this blog > post: > > https://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/10/15/swedish- > scientists-claim-lenr-explanation-break-through/ > > > > is now public here: > > https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/description?CC=EP&NR= > 3086323A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=&date=20161026&DB=&locale=en_EP > > > > Mats > > www.animpossibleinvention.com > > > > > > > > >
