color blind in a sea of red flags It seems some consider that a place wher you can debate is a place where the enemy have control, especially if he raises a mass of clear evidence that are very very annoying.
LENR community have to clean it's glasses, like APS have to. http://www.princeton.edu/~rbenabou/papers/REP_4_BW_nolinks_corrected%201.pdf Let it be clear that, like most of all people having an opinion, I am paid by nobody, have no asset invested (unlike Sifferkoll who have clear conflict of interest, unlike ECW who depend on e-cat). Lenr-forum is, by luck, branded on LENR, a solidly proven phenomenon, who scope is however questioned (from proven PdD, to much more like NiH, biotransmutation, ), and moderators (not me, i don't moderate, sorry) stuggle with aggressive people on all sides, attacking ad hominem, often without arguments, or like here with conspiracy theories, because available facts cannot be defended. I'm sincerely tired to see how we tolerate scam artist. I wait for the hanging of a few more. Suspending you disbelief is a good things (I did that on Rossi for too long), provided this is not to believe however, but there is a moment where evidences are so clear, that like a physisict have to admit LENr is a real phenomenon, we have to admit Rossi manipulated the tests, and Levi failed to measure heat correctly in Lugano. As jed says, it seems the domain is expiring slowly despite our unjustified enthusiasm. How many good lab professional calorimetry published recently ? How many modern instruments used to analyse details of the NAE, radiation emitted, anisotropy and spectrum ? there are, but so few. SKINR, ENEA, Coolescence ? and even, what is the real budgets? I compare their equipments wit the one used to develop next generation of accumulators, of superconductors, of TEG ... Most work are done with old equipments, if not kitchen devices, sometime manipulated by experienced scientists, and sometime just by hobbyists. Time for spring cleaning. 2017-03-29 23:32 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>: > I view post modernism as a sick joke, expressed by generally meaningless > sentences. Why Puckrose would waste so many words writing about it is a > puzzle. Making astroturf has a purpose even if it is evil and for greed. > AA > > > On 3/29/2017 4:38 PM, Alain Sepeda wrote: > > Maybe this is because of the French > https://areomagazine.com/2017/03/27/how-french- > intellectuals-ruined-the-west-postmodernism-and-its-impact-explained/ > > I have the subtle impression some of us live in an information bubble... > Is it me? > > > > 2017-03-29 18:14 GMT+02:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>: > >> It seems that this forum with Beene, Jed Rothwell et al are doing a >> pretty good job of "astroturfing" >> https://youtu.be/-bYAQ-ZZtEU (Thanks Sifferkoll) >> >> See also. http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/why-is-it-important-for- >> dardenindustrial-heat-to-take-control-of-the-lenr-forum/ >> >> AA >> >> >> On 3/28/2017 4:00 PM, a.ashfield wrote: >> >>> Beene, >>> What makes you think that is Rossi? >>> Or do you just lap up fake news? >>> >> AA >> >>> >>> On 3/28/2017 3:43 PM, Jones Beene wrote: >>> >>>> For anyone needing a smile (and don't we all?) an amazing mystery image >>>> of the reinvented-inventor has appeared on lenr-forum.com ... >>>> >>>> https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/1532-17504250-10154451 >>>> 685095794-8147171188661115195-o-jpg/ >>>> >>>> It's early for jury consultants, but the "Redford look" is in this >>>> year, or perhaps AR is lecturing new hires at his factory in Miami where >>>> robotic mass production of the quark-X is underway... no? what about taking >>>> a break from audition for "Most Interesting Man in the World" beer ad ? Dos >>>> Equis can relabel it "quark-XX" if he gets the gig? >>>> >>>> Stay thirsty my friend... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
