more... In the proton 21 case, no hydrogen is present. So the perplexing thing for me to understand is that both nanowires and metalized hydrogen look and perform identically in these emission studies.
In order to preface Keith Fredericks' video, a proviso is offered. In order to get the monopole magnetic property of the nanoparticle to express itself, a PT (parity-time symmetry breaking) state change is required. In other works, the nanoparticle does not follow time symmetry after the state change. This could be the reason why it looks like it is going backward in time. For example, the nanoparticle behaves like the positron that looks like an electron that has suffered a PT state change and therefore acts like an electron going backward in time. ICCF-18 : Keith Fredericks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRKblAn8lLI On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:03 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Holmlid has explained that metalized hydrogen is a superatom where the > positive charge carriers are located in the center of the crystal and the > negative charged carriers are located in a cloud orbiting around the > positive center. > > > > > This metalized structure is an example of HOLE superconductivity. Protons > are the holes and they are superconducting. > > > Particle tracks produced by LENR ash show a strange type of particle that > looks to me like metalized hydrogen particles charged up with and carrying > a large about of energy, > > > > The photos of this metalized crystal in X-ray photo emulsions show what is > going on. A handful of people or groups that I know of have done research > on this metalized hydride but they might have not understood what the > particle that they were seeing actually was. > > > > These groups were the guys describing the monopole, the AIRBUS guys, > Leonid Urutskoev, and the Proton 21 people. > > > IMHO, the person who has done the best work is Keith A. Fredericks at > http://restframe.com/ > > > Keith does not know what he is seeing has comes about, but he does > understand how the metalized hydride behaves. > > Keith thinks that the energy loaded metalized hydride crystal is a > tachyon. > > > This tachyon is a very energy intensive analog particle that acts like a > synthetic monopole. Keith has captured the paths of these particles as they > ionize photo emulsion chemicals. From this method, he has detected the > magnetic and energy content of these analog particles. > > > > I have continually explained how duality in physics works; metalized > hydrides behave like a tachyon. There is an entire field in string theory > that predicts what a tachyon will do. One feature of its behavior is > Hadronization where energy is converted into mesons. > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadronization > > > > https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-is-known-about-tachy/ > > > > What Holmlid has built might be a quasiparticle of metallized hydrogen > that looks like and behaves just like a tachyon is projected to behave in > string theory. > > > Keith has calculated that the energy carried by these strange particles is > huge at 7.29 × 10e6 GeV /c2 and with a magnetic field of β0 = 1.83 × 10e7 > > On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> In the early days of cold fusion (early 1990s) there were dozens of >> papers on so-called "low energy emissions" which happened merely from >> loading or exposure of hydrogen to both nickel and palladium - and often >> with no other input power being used. >> >> This was NOT electrolysis. Many of the papers originated in India or >> Italy and few from the USA. The testing was done using x-ray film, often >> the kind used by dentists and the result is a foggy film known as an >> "autoradiograph". In fact, the radioactive properties of Uranium were first >> discovered in 1896 by Henri Becquerel using fogging of film, in a very >> similar way. >> >> Various filters can be used to estimate the energy of the emission - >> which is called "low energy" in many of the papers, but it was in the soft >> x-ray range of 500 eV to 10 keV. These photons are far from low energy >> compared to visible light and are only "low" compared to gammas. >> >> The upper end of this range is where tritium decay occurs, and based on >> that and the estimated half-life of exposed metal - some of the old papers >> conclude that tritium was being produced from light water and nickel, which >> is most unlikely given the lack of a suitable mechanism for tritium. >> >> Names of experimenters are Focardi, Piantelli, Srinivasan, >> Sankaranarayanan, Notoya, Rout and others. >> >> BTW - these emissions were seen using either hydrogen or deuterium or >> both and there was no advantage for deuterium, so this was NOT cold fusion >> per se. For instance, "Copious low energy emissions from Palladium loaded >> with hydrogen or deuterium," Indian Journal of Technology, 29, 5071, (1991) >> Rout et al. At least one paper got picked up by Fusion Technology. >> >> It is too bad that this niche was not pursued further to determine the >> mechanism of the soft x-rays and to attempt scale-up. In retrospect, the >> implications of this kind of energetic radiation happening from mere >> exposure of metal to hydrogen, and with zero added power should have gotten >> more people excited than it did. For those of us who are revisiting this >> niche in light of what Holmlid has (more recently) reported - it is very >> exciting... since Holmlid has a viable theory and identification of the >> species responsible. >> >> In short, this niche of relatively energetic photons occurring >> spontaneously, with no power applied other than pumping the H2 gas, may >> represent a more commercializable result than actual fusion since the >> radiation is easily shielded, and especially since it was said to be 100% >> reproducible at the time. If Holmlid is correct, the ash could be the most >> valuable part of the process. >> >> >> >
