My reply accidentally went to Roger's personal email address. Eric
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi v. Darden To: ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> Hi Roger, If Galileo directed repeated, charged personal attacks with crass language at valued participants on LENR Forum, he might not have lasted long. I don't know what his personality was like, and I suspect he just made claims that people didn't want to here [hear]. But if he was pugnacious in the sense of changing the conversation from a debate to simple personal attacks, the world would have had to benefit from his knowledge and insight through some channel other than LENR Forum. Eric On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 12:47 PM, ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com > wrote: > >>We would ideally *not* attract pugnacious participants > > Galileo was pugnacious > > > > On Monday, 3 July 2017, 16:11, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Kevin, > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > You have a perception of someone who claims to be a lawyer who has missed > at least 2 major aspects of the law with respect to this case. You have a > one-sided perception. HE WAS THE ONE WHO STARTED THE INSULTS. But you > put ME on probation. That says volumes about your moderating ability. > > > In your pugnacious attacks, you will drive away informed participants such > as woodworker. woodworker's slights were subtle. Your retorts were crass > and sought to escalate the matter. Hopefully the distinction is apparent > to you. Informed participants with relevant experience are the people we > seek to attract. We would ideally *not* attract pugnacious participants > such as yourself, but there's only so much we can do. > > You say I was given a request on a side thread, and then a warning AFTER I > WAS PUT ON PROBATION. Your approach is completely screwed up. > > > Yes, point conceded. Better recollecting what I had in mind when I said > you were on "probation" (not something that has not been formalized at LENR > Forum), you were basically put in the category of participants such as > Sifferkoll the minute I saw that you were on the attack. I've seen you in > action on Vortex, so your reputation proceeded you. > > I'm going to disengage in this discussion with you about moderation at > LENR Forum at this point and allow you the last word. > > > Eric > > > >
