Geez, Eric, it's like pulling teeth. You don't see where the source of the problem is. The source is when someone STARTS insults and gets away with it. You let some people on your forum insult away. Now you want to attract Vorts who are going to have to go through the same kind of bullshit in order to post on your forum without going on probation. You don't even see the problem.
You like to characterize some posts as "subtle" while others are "crass" but NOWHERE on your forum is that bullshit delineation outlined so that people can know ahead of time. It's completely full of shit. You say I have the last word but... then ... look below and now you have something else to say. You aren't even a man of your word. At least the Vorts know what they're up against. You may not realize this that I did you a huge favor but I'm not sure it's a good thing to give Vorts warning of a completely unfair setup where you are going to look through Vortex but not Shane's nor Mary's history of trolling. Eric: Pull your head out. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 7:18 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > You have a perception of someone who claims to be a lawyer who has missed >> at least 2 major aspects of the law with respect to this case. You have a >> one-sided perception. HE WAS THE ONE WHO STARTED THE INSULTS. But you >> put ME on probation. That says volumes about your moderating ability. >> > > In your pugnacious attacks, you will drive away informed participants such > as woodworker. woodworker's slights were subtle. Your retorts were crass > and sought to escalate the matter. Hopefully the distinction is apparent > to you. Informed participants with relevant experience are the people we > seek to attract. We would ideally *not* attract pugnacious participants > such as yourself, but there's only so much we can do. > > You say I was given a request on a side thread, and then a warning AFTER I >> WAS PUT ON PROBATION. Your approach is completely screwed up. >> > > Yes, point conceded. Better recollecting what I had in mind when I said > you were on "probation" (not something that has not been formalized at LENR > Forum), you were basically put in the category of participants such as > Sifferkoll the minute I saw that you were on the attack. I've seen you in > action on Vortex, so your reputation proceeded you. > > I'm going to disengage in this discussion with you about moderation at > LENR Forum at this point and allow you the last word. > > Eric > >
