Eric: Of COURSE you're happy with your own moderating because you are so one-sided at the approach.
You have a perception of someone who claims to be a lawyer who has missed at least 2 major aspects of the law with respect to this case. You have a one-sided perception. HE WAS THE ONE WHO STARTED THE INSULTS. But you put ME on probation. That says volumes about your moderating ability. You say I was given a request on a side thread, and then a warning AFTER I WAS PUT ON PROBATION. Your approach is completely screwed up. Here is the latest. Someone says I post a lie even though it was Rossi who posted it. When are you going to put a stop to the bullshit that you have power to stop? Dewey Weaver wrote: <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/4745-rossi-vs-darden-developments-part-2/?postID=63694#post63694> Kevmo - not going to let you get away with the Rossi IP license buyout offer mention - that is yet another lie and it did not happen. Regarding your other non-stop creative Planet Rossi inference pattern- do you think that your "Rossi realization" scenario included getting caught claiming that an empty reactor was generating as much excess heat output as a "loaded reactor"? Dewey: It has been shown upthread that Rossi claimed to offer the IP buyout. It may be a Rossi lie but it IS a claim on his blog, along with other bloviating claims that many of us would like to see addressed. So quit calling it a lie unless you can prove that Rossi did not claim it. The moderators of this forum preclude me from responding to your "loaded insults" so I would suggest you quit posting them. On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Eric, you're completely full of shit. >> >> The example I posted wasn't even an insult and it was moved to some other >> thread. > > > Here are some of your posts that were moved; readers will be the judge of > how much value you added to the conversation in posting them, and how much > they simply served to needlessly make the place a little more toxic: > > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance- > items/?postID=62695#post62695 > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance- > items/?postID=62652#post62652 > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance- > items/?postID=62662#post62662 > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance- > items/?postID=62674#post62674 > > Once I saw that you were in full-on attack mode, I began to move your > posts to the bargain bin with prejudice, in order to avoid allowing the > place to devolve into the war that you sought to bring about. > > And NO, you are NOT giving notice that certain posts have been moved to >> another thread. NOT EVEN ONE of my posts had that notification. > > > How about these two notices? The first in the bargain bin thread, where > everyone but you will have known to look, and the second in the thread > where you were posting your belligerent stuff: > > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance- > items/?postID=62688#post62688 > https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/4745-rossi-vs- > darden-developments-part-2/?postID=62696#post62696 > > >> You're so concerned about spam that it goes down to NOT EVEN ONE >> notification onthread until you're getting questioned about it. > > > Hopefully we’ve cleared up this misconception. > > You say it was a judgement call; your judgement is called into question as >> a result. >> >> Some of this stuff is so simple. I've seen comments that were moved to >> another thread but they had already been quoted. So what you could do... >> what you should do... what I would do with your capabilities... is just >> quote the comment, remove the offending remarks and say that the original >> post was moved to the timeout/penalty box thread. Then everyone is on >> notice. >> >> Instead you prefer to put people on "probation" without them even knowing >> about it. > > > You were given a request and then a warning, as I said above. You were on > a roll, and if you were allowed to continue, you would have brought the > conversation down a notch, which you did, while you were in your zone. > > >> Also, if you're going to be sending some comments that contain insults >> over to other threads then you should start with the guy who starts with >> the insults. Your treatment of the issue has been completely one-sided. >> I did not start with the insults against the lawyer, he started in on me. > > > Part of your difficulty may be that you’re willing to escalate what you > perceive to be subtle slights into a full-blown brawl. Subtle slights that > don’t use foul language have a much easier time making it through than > full-on ad homs with crass language. > > You value the newbie lawyer over someone like me who's been signed on for >> 2 years because, well, he claims to be a lawyer even though someone >> upthread tried to dox him and question the legitimacy of his claim. For a >> lawyer, he sure missed quite a few legal points. > > > My perception, and it’s just my perception, is that he knows something > about the law from years of experience practicing it. That does count for > something. > > Mary Yugo isn't even a woman. He got booted rightfully so from this >> forum and he/she's trolling yours. If you had wisdom you'd remove her/it >> from your forum as well. > > > In giving Mary the boot, we would be editorializing the content. > > >> You should just admit that you made a mistake and hope that vorts will >> want to head on over to your discussion. > > > I’m quite happy with my treatment of you, as it's kept the level of > conversation over at LENR Forum from taking a dive as a consequence of your > belligerent interactions, and you’re still on probation. > > Eric > > > On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Eric, you're completely full of shit. >> >> The example I posted wasn't even an insult and it was moved to some other >> thread. And NO, you are NOT giving notice that certain posts have been >> moved to another thread. NOT EVEN ONE of my posts had that notification. >> You're so concerned about spam that it goes down to NOT EVEN ONE >> notification onthread until you're getting questioned about it. You >> say it was a judgement call; your judgement is called into question as a >> result. >> >> Some of this stuff is so simple. I've seen comments that were moved to >> another thread but they had already been quoted. So what you could do... >> what you should do... what I would do with your capabilities... is just >> quote the comment, remove the offending remarks and say that the original >> post was moved to the timeout/penalty box thread. Then everyone is on >> notice. Instead you prefer to put people on "probation" without them even >> knowing about it. >> >> Also, if you're going to be sending some comments that contain insults >> over to other threads then you should start with the guy who starts with >> the insults. Your treatment of the issue has been completely one-sided. >> I did not start with the insults against the lawyer, he started in on me. >> You value the newbie lawyer over someone like me who's been signed on for 2 >> years because, well, he claims to be a lawyer even though someone upthread >> tried to dox him and question the legitimacy of his claim. For a lawyer, >> he sure missed quite a few legal points. But that didn't stop him from >> insulting someone else on the forum. When you review my comments you will >> see that I did not start any insults, my insults are responsive. >> >> Mary Yugo isn't even a woman. He got booted rightfully so from this >> forum and he/she's trolling yours. If you had wisdom you'd remove her/it >> from your forum as well. >> >> I'm not "new" to the forum, I signed up more than 2 years ago. But it >> was a backwater then so it fell off my radar. I am "new" to Rossi vs. >> Darden because it's been sitting on the back legal burner for more than a >> year. You have other commenters that are hurling insults. You should >> just admit that you made a mistake and hope that vorts will want to head on >> over to your discussion. And also, you should make your title say >> "Moderator". You're far too thin skinned to jump in as an untitled >> moderator. >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Comments get moved to another thread without notification. >>>> >>> >>> When people such as yourself flood the forum with throwaway comments, we >>> moderators would spam the place to give as many notifications. Had you >>> known how things are done on LENR Forum, you would have known that >>> throwaway comments with crass and insulting language get moved to a >>> separate thread and know where to find them. We generally put a note at >>> the bottom of a comment once it's been moved to let people know about >>> this. You did not know that LENR Forum does this, because you dived right >>> in with your throwaway insults rather than getting to know the place. >>> >>> >>>> Commenters can get put "on probation" without notification. >>> >>> >>> We put trolls and would-be brawlers on probation. >>> >>> You yourself are a moderator but it doesn't say that on your title. >>> >>> >>> I gave my reasons for this in an earlier response to you, which you do >>> not mention. I'll link to my reply: >>> >>> https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5271-clearance-items >>> /?postID=62766#post62766 >>> >>> You allow insults from some people but not others in a one-sided >>>> fashion, again without notification. >>> >>> >>> It's invariably a judgment call. If there's either a substantive point >>> that has been made, or the person is known to make good points and insult >>> everyone equally and without an emotional charge, they're less likely to >>> have a comment moved. If the insult is obviously charged and the comment >>> brings no useful additional information, it's likely to be moved. We do >>> not apply a rote formula. We apply judgment in an effort to raise the >>> level of conversation. This weighs somewhat more heavily against posters >>> who have little substantive to offer. That's just the nature of the >>> situation. >>> >>> So those of us who would like to go over there will have to jump through >>>> your unpublished moderation guidelines >>>> in order to avoid "probation". >>>> >>> >>> Or you could just lurk for awhile and see how things are done. It's a >>> natural thing to do when coming to a new forum to try watch and observe and >>> see how things are done. >>> >>> >>>> There aren't that many rules over here on Vortex but even still, some >>>> of your more vociferous and full-of-shit members over there have been >>>> banned from Vortex, like MaryYugo. >>>> >>> >>> Mary Yugo has always been controversial, but she almost invariably >>> addresses matters of substance rather than intending to rile up other forum >>> members and start a fight. She insults people, but her aim is not to start >>> a brawl. She has brought up many good points about Rossi over the years, >>> so she gets a little bit of latitude to be a character. >>> >>> Eric >>> >>> >> >
