I now believe that there is multiple LENR reaction types. For example,
Rossi has developed a low temperature LENR reaction and has tested it in
the yearlong IH test. The mechanism for this type of LENR reaction is based
on magnetic flux line focusing by the hexagonal based lattice of mica. This
reaction mechanism follows along the lines that was shown to be effective
in the Golden Balls of D. Cravins where the magnetic flux lines of a SmCo5
magnet is focused by the hexagonal based lattice of graphite.

See

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep16184

This article explains how magnetism can be focused into skyrmion magnetic
textures involving topological, non-topological and instanton droplets
driven by spin-transfer torque in materials with perpendicular magnetic
anisotropy and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya Interaction

During the year long test, Rossi has stumbled on the plasma phase LENR
reaction and has built the QuarkX reactor to take advantage of this
reaction type. Rossi has come to believe correctly that the plasma type
LENR reaction is superior to the low temperature LENR reaction type and has
in effect tossed the low temperature technology in the trash as
noncompetitive.

The QuarkX technology is very difficult because it demands very high
temperature structural materials. This requires specialized expertise in
material science and extensive testing to ensure the robustness of this
material under extreme stress over time.

The plasma based LENR reaction is centered on the production of
nanoparticles produced by the condinsation of metal vapor. Polaritons
naturally form on those nanoparticles that convert the spin of infrared
photons into powerful magnetic fields.

By the way, I believe that the SunCell is using the plasma phase LENR
reaction. Like Rossi, R. Mills has stumbled on this reaction type and is
attempting to bring it to market.

I am saying that if all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
If Mills encounters unexplained plasma based high energy reaction, it is
human nature to reform and modify your existing thinking to incorporate
that reaction into those existing theories. Mills would naturally resist
rejecting all his ideas formed over a lifetime and that are central to the
survival of his company whether they are valid or not to impartially
include a these new experimental results.

On top of that, it is in the commercial interest of Mill’s company to avoid
any nuclear based theory that would restrict his ability to patent his
experimental results or taint his work with the onus associated with LENR.

To top things off, sooner or later, someone will test the plasma type LENR
reaction for muon generation, and when the government finds out that muons
are being produced in massive amounts, then the government will take over
the LENR tech and produce a muon activated thorium based large scale
centralized grid connected gigawatt level fission power station.

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:55 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If that is true then Rossi either lacks the ability to interpret his own
> data or he intentionally misrepresented his data.
>
> Harry
>
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> You're probably right.   But there is evidence he had a COP > 1 for
>> some length of time according to the report by the person chosen by
>> both sides to administer the test.
>>
>> On 7/10/17, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Rossi was suing IH for millions of dollars, so he had to prove the
>> device
>> > in Florida worked as he claimed. If the trial proceeded I think it is
>> very
>> > likely that the preponderance of the evidence would not support his
>> claim.
>> >
>> > Harry
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On 7/9/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> OJ Simpson...
>> >>> > Obviously he was guilty.
>> >>> ***Then obviously Rossi is Not Guilty of Fraud.   You just agreed with
>> >>> the legal standard.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I cannot judge legal standards. By scientific standards and by common
>> >> sense standards he is guilty of fraud.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> > All I did was read the Penon report. That's all it takes.
>> >>> ***Bullshit.  Plenty of others have read the report and came to
>> >>> different conclusions than you did.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Not as far as I know. Some people such as Axil refuse to read the
>> report.
>> >> Others people claim they read it and reached different conclusions, but
>> >> they have not given any reasons. A few are so gullible they believe the
>> >> post hoc lies about invisible heat exchangers that do not show in
>> >> photographs. Such "conclusions" are so irrational they have no place
>> in a
>> >> serious discussion.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>  At least his next intended victims
>> >>> > have the court docket to warn them off.
>> >>> ***Well if you were to write a point by point delineation of all the
>> >>> scientific claims that are fraud then his next "intended victims"
>> >>> would have that.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> I have no idea what his next scheme will be. Perhaps it will be the
>> >> QuarkX? Rossi told Lewan in the interview that he is setting up in
>> Sweden
>> >> where people want to invest. I suppose that means he has begun a new
>> >> scam,
>> >> but maybe he made that up and there are no investors.
>> >>
>> >> - Jed
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to