I uploaded a preliminary look at Mizuno's spreadsheets. My report includes graphs, so I cannot upload it in this forum. You can read it here:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/5340-mizuno-publication-of-kw-cop2-excess-heat-results/?postID=70516#post70516 The text begins -- I received some spreadsheets from Mizuno for the data in this paper: Mizuno, T., Preprint, *Observation of excess heat by activated metal and deuterium gas*. J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2017. http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTpreprintob.pdf The sheets included: BCD60520.xls, 120 W calibration, date 2016/5/20 BND60519.xls, 120 W excess heat, date 2016/5/19 I uploaded a copy of the latter here: https://drive.google.com/open?…r0UahtG1ZPAJmAJmejB6EMipY I have not yet uploaded the first one. The method of computing excess heat is still a little unclear to me. There was some confusion about the area of the outlet, which we now believe should be 0.0044 m^2. This affects the formula for the total weight of air that moves through the calorimeter per second. It will increase the estimate of excess heat in the paper. I will soon upload a revised pre-print reflecting this change. The figures and graphs graphs in this report are based on the outlet area of 0.0044 m^2. I thought I would make a simplified, preliminary analysis putting aside these issues. I do not need to know that absolute level of heat to compare the calibration to the (apparent) excess heat test. I need only compare temperatures. I made one assumption: Because the blower power is 4.7 W for both runs, I assume the air flow rate and calorimetry are the same in both runs. . . .
