Reference: Enhancement of cloud formation by droplet charging rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/464/2098/2561.full.pdf
Shea & Smart (1995) also demonstrated ion production associated with a solar proton event in a surface ionization chamber, at Cheltenham, Maryland (398 N). This ionization was explained to be caused by muons, i.e. secondary particles generated from the solar protons. Other sources of high-energy particles in the lower atmosphere include thunderstorms (Wilson 1925; Lidvansky 2003), from which there is surface experimental evidence for accelerated electrons (Khaerdinov et al. 2005). --------------------------------------------- Increased cloud formation and electrification of the atmosphere could be an as yet unrecognized consequence of prolific use of LENR in petawatt level power production. It is a good bet that LENR produces muons as a primary format of nuclear energy reformulation. Heat generation is only a minor energy pathway. If LENR gains traction as a primary source for global energy production, the atmosphere could experience a massive increase in water droplet ionization and electrical charge amplification from LENR moderated muon creation. Muons from a LENR reactor can send very energetic muons high into the atmosphere where their interaction with water vapor is inevitable. This could result in a permanent loss in global fair weather conditions in a permanently overcast world. The deployed base of solar panel power production could be rendered ineffectual and the gloomy cloud shrouded earth could enter a new epoch of global cooling as little heat or light would penetrate to reach the ground. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: > What most people don't know also is that the cosmic ray flux affects the > weather. Galactic cosmic rays are variable and depend in part on our solar > system's orbital position in the spiral arm. Cosmic rays variably affect > the weather by penetration into the lower atmosphere, nucleating water > droplets, and hence forming clouds. The amount of cosmogenic cloud > formation depends on the cosmic ray rate and average energy. > > Solar activity varies the solar magnetic field which changes the Earth's > magnetic field, and hence the Earth's magnetic protection from cosmic > rays. Of course, greater solar activity also affects the rate of solar > generated high energy particles which behave similarly to cosmic rays. > > Increased cosmic ray/solar particle flux causes more clouds and causes a > net cooling on the Earth. Increased solar magnetic fields cause increased > Earth's magnetic fields that shield from cosmic rays. So, increased solar > magnetic fields means less clouds on Earth and higher temperatures on the > Earth. > > As I understand it, the link between solar magnetic fields, solar particle > flux, cosmic ray flux, and clouds is not part of present climate models. > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:16 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Periodically, the cross connection between abnormal solar activity and >> hurricanes is mentioned in the ALT-SCI press. >> >> >> >> https://www.inverse.com/article/36183-solar-flare-hurricane-irma >> >> >> >> Of course this year is no exception as the strongest storm in a decade >> and the strongest solar flares in the past 11 year cycle are aligned in >> time. >> >> >> >> It is a complex interaction but there seems to be something beyond >> coincidence going on in this alignment. Often water temperature is said to >> play a role in hurricanes, but this year the Ocean water temperature in >> hurricane alley is normal >> >> >> >> Perhaps the sunspot itself is not the driving force for more intense >> storms on earth but instead, the sunspot feeds a greater tonnage of dense >> hydrogen into the solar wind, and that dense hydrogen becomes the driving >> mechanism for the extra power of the storm. >> >> >> > >
