Hurricane Harvey condensed 33 trillion gallons of water over land. In industry you would pull a vacuum in a LARGE surface condenser with LOTS of surface area and the ability to remove LOTS of heat to sustain the VACUUM for condensing to continue.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2017/08/30/harvey-has-unloaded-24-5-trillion-gallons-of-water-on-texas-and-louisiana/ Just saying On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:44 PM Adrian Ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > AXIL, > I think Svensmark was the dirt to come up with this theory and he made a > good video describing it here: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANMTPF1blpQ > (You can skip the first 2:20 of pretty pictures) > > The source of hurricanes seems to be a combination of a cooler upper > atmosphere and warmer sea surface. The temperature difference drives the > formation. It's not just warmer water. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Sep 8, 2017 2:58 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sunspots, hurricanes and dense hydrogen > > Reference: > > Enhancement of cloud formation by droplet charging > rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royprsa/464/2098/2561.full.pdf > > Shea & Smart (1995) also demonstrated ion production associated with a > solar proton event in a surface ionization chamber, at Cheltenham, Maryland > (398 N). This ionization was explained to be caused by muons, i.e. > secondary particles generated from the solar protons. Other sources of > high-energy particles in the lower atmosphere include thunderstorms (Wilson > 1925; Lidvansky 2003), from which there is surface experimental evidence > for accelerated electrons (Khaerdinov et al. 2005). > > --------------------------------------------- > > Increased cloud formation and electrification of the atmosphere could be > an as yet unrecognized consequence of prolific use of LENR in petawatt > level power production. It is a good bet that LENR produces muons as a > primary format of nuclear energy reformulation. Heat generation is only a > minor energy pathway. > > If LENR gains traction as a primary source for global energy production, > the atmosphere could experience a massive increase in water droplet > ionization and electrical charge amplification from LENR moderated muon > creation. > > Muons from a LENR reactor can send very energetic muons high into the > atmosphere where their interaction with water vapor is inevitable. This > could result in a permanent loss in global fair weather conditions in a > permanently overcast world. The deployed base of solar panel power > production could be rendered ineffectual and the gloomy cloud shrouded > earth could enter a new epoch of global cooling as little heat or light > would penetrate to reach the ground. > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > What most people don't know also is that the cosmic ray flux affects the > weather. Galactic cosmic rays are variable and depend in part on our solar > system's orbital position in the spiral arm. Cosmic rays variably affect > the weather by penetration into the lower atmosphere, nucleating water > droplets, and hence forming clouds. The amount of cosmogenic cloud > formation depends on the cosmic ray rate and average energy. > > Solar activity varies the solar magnetic field which changes the Earth's > magnetic field, and hence the Earth's magnetic protection from cosmic > rays. Of course, greater solar activity also affects the rate of solar > generated high energy particles which behave similarly to cosmic rays. > > Increased cosmic ray/solar particle flux causes more clouds and causes a > net cooling on the Earth. Increased solar magnetic fields cause increased > Earth's magnetic fields that shield from cosmic rays. So, increased solar > magnetic fields means less clouds on Earth and higher temperatures on the > Earth. > > As I understand it, the link between solar magnetic fields, solar particle > flux, cosmic ray flux, and clouds is not part of present climate models. > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:16 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > Periodically, the cross connection between abnormal solar activity and > hurricanes is mentioned in the ALT-SCI press. > > https://www.inverse.com/article/36183-solar-flare-hurricane-irma > > Of course this year is no exception as the strongest storm in a decade and > the strongest solar flares in the past 11 year cycle are aligned in time. > > It is a complex interaction but there seems to be something beyond > coincidence going on in this alignment. Often water temperature is said to > play a role in hurricanes, but this year the Ocean water temperature in > hurricane alley is normal > > Perhaps the sunspot itself is not the driving force for more intense > storms on earth but instead, the sunspot feeds a greater tonnage of dense > hydrogen into the solar wind, and that dense hydrogen becomes the driving > mechanism for the extra power of the storm. > > > > >
