https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIlijUSJMmg&t=488s
Start video at 8:00 to save time. Rare earth magnets produce spin because these types of magnets produce anisometric (unbalanced) magnetic field lines. An electro magnet does not produce spin because it produces isometric (balanced) field lines. A superfluid like in Holmlid's ultra dense hydrogen will produce unbalanced magnetic filed lines because it is a superconductor. The UDH will behave like a rare earth magnetic and produce LENR effects. In the Dennis Cravens golden balls, SmCo5 powder was used to drive the LENR reaction. This type of magnet produces magnetic vortex field lines. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:05 PM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Quantum spin (nanometer level and below) is always in motion, and the > anomaly would be lack of motion - yet at the micro-level self-generated > spin as angular momentum would imply “perpetual motion” if it were a > reproducible and “harvestable” phenomenon. Is there a middle ground? > > There are a number of YT videos that show experimental proof of the > existence of a magnetic vortex, which is a kind of dynamic spin. The > problem is that mainstream physics is unaware that there is such a > phenomenon. It is not taught at University and often considered as being as > “fringe” such as an “aether” is a fringe notion. In fact there are > cross-connections. Part of the problem is semantics, in that everyone > agrees that an electric field superimposed on a magnetic field will > dynamically rotate, but usually an electric field requires its own input > power so there is no free lunch. > > The real issue becomes this: can a static magnetic field from a PM > generate its own inherent electric field (no input) or another kind of > field which has EM characteristics? Since that will imply that an aether of > some kind is present it gets to be the fringe of the fringe. Of particular > relevance is the epo-field defined aether of Hotson. > > We can see spontaneous magnetic vortex rotation in many videos (not faked) > and the direction of rotation changes when magnetic polarity is reversed. > The rotation is either left handed or right handed. You can see the salient > points in the debate about a magnetic spin vortex by watching this video or > others similar - and then reading the comments. As with most arguments > involving semantics – both sides are partially correct. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd2IyoBl2ag > > At about 2:10 and 3:10 in this video… which is probably the most important > of the lot wrt the Magnetic Spin Vortex… > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afQW8FT02DM > > …wjich is indisputable proof (not that anyone doubts it) that plasma ions > in a magnetic field will spontaneously rotate at extreme rpm. > > The only question then becomes – does the aether exist in another way or > definition that resembles a plasma in 3-Space? And if so, can any > significant level of “free energy” be extracted, even if low? > > IOW – and stated in reverse - when the magnetic field does not appear to > self-rotate, is that because there is no aether or because another > associated force overpower the weak magnetic spin vortex effect so as to > inhibit rotation? > > This evolves into an explanation which can explain the so-called Faraday > paradox in a slightly different way, and it relies on an aether similar to > Hotsons. > > > > > > >
