Any particle with integer spin is by definition a boson, so in the case of an EPO it's a massive one. Beyond that, i have nothing..!
As regards the potential source in LENR, either there's a corresponding change in entropy in the fuel, hence a local source, or there isn't, so a non-local one (ie. over-unity). Like most folks, i'm expecting a change in mass of the spent fuel. How and why it happens i have little idea, but look forward to finding out.. ..and as for the Planck scale, is there even sufficient spacetime to manifest motion? Doubtless, alternative dimensions become relevant down there, and i am partial to the notion of an active vacuum.. but all angels and pinheads to me i'm afraid.. On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:20 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > It seems Vortex-l has a new voice in Vibrator!. It fits nicely with the > current subject line regarding spin and angular momentum, although, with a > negative energy twist. It reminds me of Weaver coming onto the LENR Forum > to take on the E-Cat World view a couple years back. > > > > Be that what it is, my question is what do you call an EPO with spin 1 and > 0 charge? > > > > Is it a Bose particle or something else? However, if it exists, it may be > a nice conductor of angular momentum. At small distances (f- meters and > smaller) maybe angular momentum acts like charge with a plus and minus sign > and can be divided among particles of a coherent system. Once the > necessary resonant condition happens to the coherent system. the EPO > divides into 2 Fermi particles—a positron and a electron which react with > each other or the entire system to create a new coherent system with lower > potential energy. Some potential energy may transform to increased orbital > momentum energy states or may leave the system as EM energy and angular > momentum of .511 Mev photons. > > > > The resonant conditions I suggest are created within the coherent system > by the change in potential energy of the system caused by the intrusion of > force fields—electric, magnetic or gravitational—in the coherent system. > From the LENR testing it would appear that any one of these force fields > may catalyze the LENR phenomena. > > > > This model may fit well with P. Hatt’s theory regarding creation of mass > from electrons and positrons. He is able to predict magnetic moments and > mass of muons, protons and neutrons quite accurately with respect to > current experimental data. > > > > (As an aside I doubt the B magnetic fields have a curl of 0 at the Plank > scale. Thus, Maxwell’s equations are only an approximation of what > happens in macroscopic systems. The continuous math provided by the > calculus really does not apply at small distances IMHO. I suspect that > relativity theory has the same problem.) > > > > Bob Cook > > > > > > > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows 10 > > > > *From: *JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> > *Sent: *Thursday, October 19, 2017 6:35 AM > *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject: *RE: [Vo]:Magnetic Spin Vortex > > > > > > V! sez: > > - I'm familiar with the producers of the above videos. In every > instance of these angular accelerations, they are being produced by the > linear accelerations of Mr Hand, either waving a stator ring or poking a > magnet at a field etc.. > > > > Perhaps not. There is both a logical explanation for spontaneous rotation > (in *Nature*, no less) - and several vids with no Mr. Hand… > > > > https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v547/n7664/full/nature23290.html > > > > “The origin of this anisotropy is purely electronic—the so-called > electronic nematicity. Unusually, the nematic director is not aligned with > the crystal axes, unless a substantial orthorhombic distortion is imposed. > The fact that this anisotropy occurs in a material that exhibits > high-temperature superconductivity may not be a coincidence.” > > >
