The QX is a downsized version of the SunCell with the plasma ball reduced to the size of a speck of dust. You can understand what is happening inside the QX by looking at what is happening inside the SunCell. The metal used in the QX is aluminum whereas the metal used to support the plasma inside the SunCell is silver.Lithium is not a reactant and remains in the vapor form. The hydrogen pressure is very high because the amount of solid fuel that is placed inside the QX must be substantial in order for the fuel loading to be manageable. Rossi cannot work with(load) nanograms of fuel
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the experiments I am aware of, waveforms were only tried as applied to > the heater coils (or in my case to a magnetic field coil). There was no > evidence of enhanced XH. This could be because the waveform was not well > "coupled" to the active medium. These were heat driven Parkhomov-like > experiments. In the case of others that have seen benefit from such waves, > the stimulus was applied more directly to the reaction medium - > electrolysis or to the hydrogenated wires. I believe there could be > benefit in such stimuli, but it would have to be appropriately coupled to > the reaction. > > In a conversation I was having with MFMP folks, I had this to say about > what I thought was described for the QX reactor and power supply: > > > *Since it has been suggested/said that Li is present inside the QX, during > a discharge it will be in gas phase; and when it is turned OFF, it will > condense on the inside of the tube and conduct across the electrodes. > Then, upon re-start, the tube will be shorted with this condensed Li metal > path and a high current will be needed to heat the Li to boiling. Once the > Li path evaporates, the tube will have to be run in gas discharge mode. So > initially the tube is a short and needs a high current, low voltage to > begin, and then it has to switch into gas discharge mode which is low > current high voltage. Also, in the gas discharge mode, the supply will > have to be ballasted as a current source. This is why the supply is > complex, the waveform is complex, and why it is also difficult to > characterize what energy has been supplied over time to the tube. There is > the claim that there is balanced electron/ion flow. That would be the H+ & > Li+ positive ions and e- negative electrons conducting bodies.* > > * In a plasma tube, the plasma itself can be at 2700K while the glass > itself can be kept cool with water cooling. The heat is transferred by the > plasma atoms striking the glass, and there will be a cooler gas buffer zone > around the inside of the glass where it is too cool to be in plasma state - > insulating the core plasma discharge. The higher the gas pressure, the > more power that must be added to the plasma to compensate for the cooling > of the glass tube on the plasma. This tells me that the gas pressure > inside the QX is probably pretty low, probably under 50 torr, and maybe > more like 10 torr. The problem you would have is keeping the Li from > condensing on the glass tube in that cool zone and shorting out the plasma > discharge. It may take care of itself - as the lithium condenses on the > glass, the plasma will go to it instead of the electrodes causing the Li to > re-boil (sort of like an arc discharging to a piece of metal wire brought > into the gap between a spark discharge).* > > * Rossi has not demonstrated that his tube produces XE to any of us. We > basically have to take the unreliable, untrustworthy word of a technically > incompetent scoundrel that he is producing any XE - and on a waveform that > would be very difficult to characterize by someone that is technically > sound.* > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:31 AM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Bob >> >> >> >> Have you (or MFMP) experimented with any variation of the Dardik >> superwave? >> >> >> >> I think it is more than coincidence that Rossi, Brillouin, Kimmel, >> Energetics etc, etc have employed interfering waveforms as the input power. >> >> >> >> Even if Rossi’s recent effort was a null result, it is true that his PS >> seems unusually lossy. >> >> >> >> Sadly, that is the most hopeful thing that anyone can honestly say about >> it…. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> - the demo served no net purpose - except possibly to those there >> that were granted greater access to the data. You and I should take it as >> a presumed null experiment since there was inadequate data shared to show >> any XE. >> >> >> >> JonesBeene wrote: >> >> >> >> >> - The most important Euro Patent from Dardik, El-Boher et al entitled >> "Pulsed low energy nuclear reaction power generators" EP 1656678 B1 with a >> grant date of 2004. This is also known as the "superwave" patent. It is >> similar and precedes the Brillouin IP - and will also rain on the Godes >> parade, if it turns out that structured waveforms are the key to success. >> >> >> >> >> > >
