Not true. Learn how Hawking's radiation works. On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:02 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote:
> In reply to Eric Walker's message of Thu, 1 Feb 2018 16:46:41 -0700: > Hi, > [snip] > >If we take the other option, then nothing in our timeline ever happens to > >things that have crossed over the event horizon, and it is meaningless to > >talk about its contents. > > > It's worse than that - nothing ever even gets to cross the event horizon > from > our point of view (because time slows to the point where the universe > comes to > an end before anything actually gets to the event horizon.) > (Which BTW is what originally led me to the notion that there is nothing > in a > black hole.) > This also means that the growth in mass of a black hole must come from > matter/energy accumulating in a tight orbit (just) outside the event > horizon. > Regards, > > > Robin van Spaandonk > > local asymmetry = temporary success > >
