You made me go bact to the source article http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169895
Abstract: " Large signals of charged light mesons are observed in the laser-induced particle flux from ultra-dense hydrogen H(0) layers. The mesons are formed in such layers on metal surfaces using < 200 mJ laser pulse-energy. The time variation of the signal to metal foil collectors and the magnetic deflection to a movable pin collector are now studied. *Relativistic charged particles with velocity up to 500 MeV u**-1 thus 0.75 c** are observed.* Characteristic decay time constants for meson decay are observed, for *charged and neutral kaons* and also for *charged pions*. Magnetic deflections agree with *charged pions* *and kaons**. *Theoretical predictions of the decay chains from kaons to muons in the particle beam agree with the results. Muons are detected separately by standard scintillation detectors in laser-induced processes in ultra-dense hydrogen H(0) as published previously. The muons formed do not decay appreciably within the flight distances used here. Most of the laser-ejected particle flux with MeV energy is not deflected by the magnetic fields and is thus neutral, either being neutral kaons or the ultra-dense H*N*(0) precursor clusters. Photons give only a minor part of the detected signals. PACS: 67.63.Gh, 14.40.-n, 79.20.Ds, 52.57.-z." On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Neutral particle flux probably won't create substantial electromagnetic > noise and certainly no gamma. Best case is that it would occasionally > knock off some electrons that would excite the characteristic x-ray > emission of their host atom. They will excite acoustic noise that would > quickly be converted to heat. > > On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> According to Holmlid, there is a high flux of neutral atomic fragments >> that receive a ton of kinetic energy from the primary reaction(nucleon >> particle decay). These fragments would dissipate their kinetic energy >> through particle collision cascades. That particle collision cascade >> would produce the pink noise. >> >> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Keep in mind that as large massive charged particles (200x that of an >>> electron), muons would not penetrate materials very well. For a given >>> energy, they are moving much slower than electrons. Also, because they are >>> so heavy, they will stop slowly, and hence, not create much bremsstrahlung >>> radiation. >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 1:11 PM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> BTW - Wouldn’t it be a hoot if muons showed up on a particular detector >>>> as 1/f^2 noise ?? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Nigel, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Since you noticed the fit initially, were you looking for it based on >>>> phenomena from another field ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I see from Alan’s posting that the context is no mystery – except to >>>> someone who was not paying attention to every detail of an excellent >>>> presentation <g> >>>> >>>> However, I think Nigel is looking for deeper significance. Universal >>>> theories of pink noise are incomplete. According to Wiki, the Tweedie >>>> hypothesis has been proposed to explain the genesis of pink noise on the >>>> basis of a mathematical convergence theorem related to statistical analysis >>>> in many systems, yet … this signal is not pink noise per se. In general >>>> the spectrum of pink noise is 1/f for what are said to be >>>> one-dimensional signals. >>>> >>>> Perhaps two-dimensional signals have a weaker power spectrum which is >>>> the reciprocal of f^2 ? At any rate, pink noise would be an obvious place >>>> to start a search for statistical significance. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
