You made me go bact to the source article

http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169895

Abstract:

" Large signals of charged light mesons are observed in the laser-induced
particle flux from ultra-dense hydrogen H(0) layers. The mesons are formed
in such layers on metal surfaces using < 200 mJ laser pulse-energy. The
time variation of the signal to metal foil collectors and the magnetic
deflection to a movable pin collector are now studied. *Relativistic
charged particles with velocity up to 500 MeV u**-1 thus 0.75 c** are
observed.* Characteristic decay time constants for meson decay are
observed, for *charged and neutral kaons* and also for *charged pions*.
Magnetic deflections agree with *charged pions* *and kaons**. *Theoretical
predictions of the decay chains from kaons to muons in the particle beam
agree with the results. Muons are detected separately by standard
scintillation detectors in laser-induced processes in ultra-dense hydrogen
H(0) as published previously. The muons formed do not decay appreciably
within the flight distances used here. Most of the laser-ejected particle
flux with MeV energy is not deflected by the magnetic fields and is thus
neutral, either being neutral kaons or the ultra-dense H*N*(0) precursor
clusters. Photons give only a minor part of the detected signals. PACS:
67.63.Gh, 14.40.-n, 79.20.Ds, 52.57.-z."

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:13 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Neutral particle flux probably won't create substantial electromagnetic
> noise and certainly no gamma.  Best case is that it would occasionally
> knock off some electrons that would excite the characteristic x-ray
> emission of their host atom.  They will excite acoustic noise that would
> quickly be converted to heat.
>
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> According to Holmlid, there is a high flux of neutral atomic fragments
>> that receive a ton of kinetic energy from the primary reaction(nucleon
>> particle decay). These fragments would dissipate their kinetic energy
>> through particle collision cascades. That particle collision cascade
>> would produce the pink noise.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 6:33 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Keep in mind that as large massive charged particles (200x that of an
>>> electron), muons would not penetrate materials very well.  For a given
>>> energy, they are moving much slower than electrons.  Also, because they are
>>> so heavy, they will stop slowly, and hence, not create much bremsstrahlung
>>> radiation.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 1:11 PM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW - Wouldn’t it be a hoot if muons showed up on a particular detector
>>>> as 1/f^2 noise  ??
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nigel,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Since you noticed the fit initially, were you looking for it based on
>>>> phenomena from another field ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see from Alan’s posting that the context is no mystery – except to
>>>> someone who was not paying attention to every detail of an excellent
>>>> presentation <g>
>>>>
>>>> However, I think Nigel is looking for deeper significance. Universal
>>>> theories of pink noise are incomplete. According to Wiki,  the Tweedie
>>>> hypothesis has been proposed to explain the genesis of pink noise on the
>>>> basis of a mathematical convergence theorem related to statistical analysis
>>>> in many systems, yet … this signal  is not pink noise per se. In general
>>>> the spectrum of pink noise is 1/f  for what are said to be
>>>> one-dimensional signals.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps two-dimensional signals have a weaker power spectrum which is
>>>> the reciprocal of f^2 ? At any rate, pink noise would be an obvious place
>>>> to start a search for statistical significance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to