I am currently working on something potentially related. I want to keep chasing what I am chasing, but there could be overlap. I am passing an unidentified energy that cannot be detected until it passes through a "window", but this works better if the detector is above, it does not (without modification) work if the order is reversed. Probably just coincidental similarity.
I have a Geiger counter, and I have some HV supplies, but I don't have anything to make a vacuum. On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:48 PM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am happy to hear peoples ideas with reasons behind those ideas. But to > engage in testing others ideas often means one has to set aside ones own > ideas. That is obviously an infinitely losing game as individuals are but > one person and the world wide web is an infinite number of others ideas. > Science has always been a combination of inspiration and perspiration > though it is in the sweating in the performance that the donnas are > separated from the primadonnas. > > > > Watch and wait or join me and make a difference. > > > > The greatest threat to the world is waiting for someone else to save it. > > > > *From:* John Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 17, 2018 8:40 AM > > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons > > > > Still, I have a reason for considering that this might possibly work > better in the vertical plane, and not by producing an artifact, > > > > So I guess you have tried it in different orientations? > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We have three identical Geiger’s that I switch positions to constantly > challenge (and eliminate) any anomalous behaviour and to reveal glitches as > well as to provide coincident background counts that are used to refine the > precision of the background vs. hot counts. The high count rates can be > intentionally produced and reduced with prescribed changes in the > experiment. So far so good. Of course this must be repeated with ever more > precision and care, an effort in process at this moment. > > > > *From:* John Berry <aethe...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Monday, April 16, 2018 11:38 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons > > > > Is there any difference when the tube, shielding and Geiger counter are > vertically disposed as in the image, or horizontally? > > > > How can you be sure it isn't some capacitive coupling effect? > > Could you ground the shields? > > Could you apply voltage spikes to the plates without them being exposed to > the spark gap directly, see if that triggers the Geiger? > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nonsense there is no such lead shielding on the experiment as suggested. > > > > As well I have been interchanging 3 independent Geiger counters to > eliminate any one being seen as being influenced by stray electrical > fields. Only the Geiger that is nearest to the experimental source shows > the anomalous count at multiples of the background. > > > > Much more work needs to be done to eliminate any and all possible errors > in this but at least the anomalous emissions are predictably able to be > induced in a repeatable fashion. In my opinion these emissions might well > be either gammas or something unusual. The Geigers have been challenged > with known beta sources and are quite unable to count betas. > > > > They are not behaving like my previous discovery of Mischugenons, I have > recently renamed these ‘Tellerons’ in honour of my colleague Edward Teller > who helped me with that discovery and indeed had speculated on their > existence decades before my discovery experiments. > > > > There are clear paths to improve and enhance this Androcles protocol that > will bring it in line with the work and teachings of Mills, Rossi, and > Piantelli. > > > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 15, 2018 8:00 PM > *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Meshugganons > > > > In Alan's experiment, the Geiger counter's activity is the function of > the thickness of the lead shielding. No shielding creates no Geiger > counter activity. > > > > On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > > Geiger counters are notoriously prone to high voltage noise interference. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 15, 2018 2:15 PM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* [Vo]:Meshugganons > > > > · > New > > · > > · #54 > <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/2461-new-energy-world-symposium-in-stockholm-on-june-18-2018/?postID=84069#post84069>[image: > Image removed by sender. 4766-the-test-png] > > > > Regarding Alan glow tube test... > > > THUNDER ENERGIES, <http://www.thunder-energies.com/>a company that uses > DR. RUGGERO SANTILLI'S TECH to detect nuclear weapons in sealed containers > uses a variant of Alan Smith's experiment. > > > > http://www.thunder-energies.co…11-articles/19-article-10 > <http://www.thunder-energies.com/index.php/ct-menu-item-18/11-articles/19-article-10> > > > > Quote > > *The hadronic reactors for the industrial synthesis of thermal neutrons > from a hydrogen gas essentially include (TEC international patent pending):* > > *1. A metal vessel filled up with a hydrogen gas at a pressure depending > on the desired neutron CPS;* > > *2. Electronic means for the remote control of the gap between a pair of > tungsten electrodes located inside said metal vessel; and* > > > > *3. A specially designed power unit delivering high voltage and high > current rapid DC discharges in between said electrodes.* > > *As shown in Figure 5, the DC arc ionizes the hydrogen atoms, thus > creating a plasma of protons and electrons; the DC arc then aligns the > proton and the electron along a magnetic field line with the appropriate > spin and other couplings; an engineering means called triggers compress the > electron inside the proton, by supplying the missing energy (which is about > one million electron Volts, 1 MeV).* > > *Display More* > > > > Sometimes a theorist can save an experimenter a lot of work by avoiding > duplicating existing technology. > > > > > > Santilli thinks that neutrons can be formed out of a union of protons and > neutrons. This is nonsense. What Santilli is producing are muons. the same > particle that Alan is generating. The US government is using cosmic ray > generated muons to detect nuclear material in shipping containers now. > > > Cosmic-Ray Muons Reveal Hidden Void in the Great Pyramid > http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/n…oid-in-the-great-pyramid/ > <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/next/ancient/cosmic-ray-muons-reveal-hidden-void-in-the-great-pyramid/> > > > > > > Muon Thomography are well known as a means to detect nuclear material > > > > Innovations In Nuclear Detection: Muon Tomography > > http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2012/ph241/khan1/ > > > > > > > > >
