What, you mean Rar Energia? It's junk, nothing to do with me, aside from actually bothering to pull the data back in 2013:
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5591&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=mrvibrating&start=465 ..the torque / angle plots are identical for all three of their supposed 'contingent conditions'. It was miserable scam, the patent applications contained abject lies. Sorry, perhaps we're getting our wires crossed - you said '"he" is taking the Rossi playbook' - i presumed in reference to moi. The system i've just validated has no data in three centuries, so you'll forgive me if i take issue with your excuse for not investigating.. went i want data, i produce it. The data i've produced from Bessler's exploit is utterly compelling. The only question left is who to show it to? You up for juggling another hot potato? On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > How can anyone validate when there is no data from a five year old > system?What is claimed for the device? Where is a video of the unit > running? > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, June 3, 2018 11:05 AM > > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU > > I've only started this thread in the attempt to get independent data. > > It's been just over a week since achieving certainty. None of the uni's > are responding to my crank emails, for some strange reason. > > Perhaps you could help refine my template? > > "Dear proper physics-talking dudes, please find enclosed evidence of my > free-energy warp-drive doomsday machine, what i've made by waving two > masses around, type stuff. Note all the weird squiggly lines in the plots, > and the nice pastel colour-scheme. Do i win £5?" > > The DoE didn't bite, UCL physics won't bite, i tried spamming it to Imp. > College physics last night, no reply yet and not really expecting one... > > So i've tried asking here, and the best suggestions so far are "measure > its efficiency as a function of CoP" (for heat pumps?) and making a > 3D-printable version of a device that's almost certain to destroy us if not > deployed in a sensible manner. > > I haven't come here to impress or gloat, i'm asking for advice on how to > proceed. Who to approach for independent corroboration? It's just > rock-bottom basics - force, mass and motion. Everyone think's the barrel's > long scraped dry, and all the uni's are focused on particle physics, dark > matter and laser spectroscopy etc. > > At least LENR is zeitgeist crank physics, posing new and exciting > impossibilities; classical mechanics OTOH - mechanical OU? - seriously? I > seriously think i've found an elephant in the custard of classical > physics? Ha..! Good luck with that eh.. > > Who should i show it to, who can help move things forwards in some way? > A volunteer, a nomination, any reliable person or group anywhere? > > > On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> wrote: > > Here we have all the elements of a fine scam. He is taking the Rossi play > book, page 1. > > > > 1. no independent data > 2. no independent experiments > 3. claim earlier experiments were wildly positive > 4. > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, June 1, 2018 5:33 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical OU > > No, no, no. > > On 1 June 2018 at 21:15, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Grimes, Damn autocorrect. > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:12 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Crimes? > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:11 PM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 1:42 PM Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Chris - Weird, reminiscent of some kind of frame-dragging effect, or > 'remanence' of the Higgs field? Sounds pretty whack either way, but hey > who am i to talk.. > > > Frank Crimes, is that you inside the Vibrator? > > > > > -- > *quae est ista quae progreditur quasi aurora **consurgens * > *pulchra ut luna electa ut sol terribilis ut acies ordinata * > > > >
