The elements transmuted by the LENR reaction are usually calcium, magnesium, sulfur, carbon, iron, aluminum. Helium is not usually found. In nature, supernova nucleosynthesis: the nucleosynthesis of chemical elements in supernova explosions are the usual nature generators of these heavier elements. Shock-wave based supernova nucleosynthesis and hydrostatic-burning processes create most of the isotopes of the elements carbon (Z = 6), oxygen (Z = 8), and elements with Z = 10–28 (from neon to nickel).
How can LENR reproduce the conditions inside an exploding supernova using a compression of elements in the fusion process? Any detection of elements heavier that helium precludes the fusion process as the cause of LENR transmutation. By the way, living thing have be found to produce supernova nucleosynthesis type elements as a usual byproduct of their life cycle. On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 1:34 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > > > In the Mizuno case we can exclude this behavior, as clustered D-D, > inside larger clusters, always will undergo fusion... > > > Always? ... doubt it. There is no evidence from Mizuno of helium and it > makes no sense to be dogmatic on the issue until evidence arrives. > > Which is to say: until we get mass spec readings for significant amounts > of helium after a long run, fusion remains just a fall-back assumption > based on old electrolysis results - and possibly unjustified for anything > else. > > Surprisingly, even with a reactor operating at 3 kw for extended periods - > there is no report of tritium or transmutation of any kind. Mizuno is > reportedly an expert at radiation detection so the lack of any mention by > him is curious, to say the least. Even if the branching ratio of LENR in > general favors mostly helium - at this high level of output there is little > logical way to claim that absolute quenching of the normal branching ratio > all the way back to zero tritium; and tritium could not be missed by him in > small amounts, if it was present. > > Home usage of the reactor almost guarantees he assumes no tritium even at > very high thermal output. He would not jeopardize his family's health. > > I agree that most of the LENR experts think deuterium fusion is > responsible for the excess heat, but as of now that seems like little more > than speculation to me - especially since in the earlier runs at 4000 Pa, > with only protium as fuel (but with rubbed Pd on nickel), more excess > energy was seen with protium-- than with deuterium under the same > conditions. This favors a non-fusion modus operandi. > > Jones > > >
