Bob
Unluckily only a few people used SO(4) so far mainly for simplifying SM
math with a more general notation. The same holds for quaternions &
octonions.
Maple has no specific SO(4) module although it is very powerful in
handling abstract physics.
The main problem all physicists will face is that the notion of
quantization will be defined more general as a fraction of a wave/orbit
length of e.g. 6 dimensions. The illusion everything is based on h
(plank quantum) was OK for the first beginners approach to nuclear and
particle physics but inside dense matter all exchange is based on
magnetic resonances. The SM claimed sea of photons (virtual particles)
of what ever nature, emerged from an other illusion that physics is
restricted to three real dimensions.
The true image of magnetic interaction is that it can be additive or
subtractive what is equivalent to compressing space (reducing covered
space time energy) or expanding space. For the old (primitive) SM model
this looks like emerging or disappearing (virtual and sometimes real)
particles.
Real particles are magnetic resonances that start a new joint rotation
whereas virtual particles just add mass to a magnetic orbit. I would
recommend to deeply investigate the Holmlid dense hydrogen system as
this experiment is currently the only one that is reproducible and
allows to add "any" mass to an existing magnetic (D*/H*) orbit. from the
physics point of view you can add as much mass as the coupling
(counter-) mass on the other "side" allows. If the mass is over the
threshold then the waves must restructure the binding (virtual coupling
charge changes) what in the proton case is about the mass needed to form
two Kaons minus proton mass. The counter mass is already (almost) given
by the latent excess mass of e.g. 2 D*-D* (pre 4-He state).
All magnetic mass has an angular momentum as any magnetic field line is
equivalent to a circular current. Thus in your sense the neutrino would
be an other form of mass than EM mass, what is highly unlikely.
Unluckily I currently have no time to model particles albeit the Holmlid
case is very interesting. For somebody with access to the detailed
experimental data it would be a matter of 2-3 days to find the resonant
(H*/D*-clusters) SO(4) orbits for Holmlids kaon/pions/muons.
J.W.
Am 10.11.19 um 21:17 schrieb [email protected]:
Jurg—
Is there computer software that does SO(4)math to your knowledge? If
so, is it publicly available?
It would seem that what you describe as rotational mixing may involve
an angular momentum quanta to give a common direction to adjacent 3D
space quanta making up a cubic (or maybe spheroidal) array of a
small—quantum-- volume(s) of EMPTY space.
EMPTY space* may itself be quantized with a value of 0 or 1 depending
on whether or not there are other space dimensions with an associated
time at 1 or above or minus 1 and lower. (Real space quanta below 0
do not exist as an axiom.)
A more complex assemblage of real spheroidal space quanta around a
single spheroidal quanta may occur with changing time quanta together
with a single angular momentum quanta associated with the central
spheroidal space quanta and a magnetic and/or electric quanta. (Note
everything that is known can be described by a 5 or maybe 6
dimensional system of time, Empty space*, real space, magnetic field,
electric field and angular momentum quanta.)
* Empty space may not be necessary to provide an adequate physical
description of reality.
Neutrinos may nicely fit into this physical system in that there would
be no magnetic or electric quanta associated with the angular momentum
quanta and the circulating space volume quanta considered for
electrons and other electrically charged primary “particles”.
Bob Cook
-----------------------------------
Bob
*From: *Jürg Wyttenbach <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Saturday, November 9, 2019 11:08 AM
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Science discoveries how LENR works
Bob,
SO(4) physics is a field only approach. Charge only occurs as a
virtual mass in interactions.
Fields do synchronize like rigid rotators. If the "orbits" are
"equivalent" then coupling occurs. But there are more criteria for a
coupling to occur as always a force must be at work that finally
"aligns" two rotating masses to form a new common rotation. Stable
orbits always involve at least two rotations, what e.g. the folks
around 1910 believed to be the orbiting electron around a proton.
Today we know that the magnetic mass of the electron couples ( 2
rotations) to the potential of the proton that is also formed by a two
rotation mass.
But unluckily this is not the full story as the electron does two more
half-rotations and also the proton has a three rotation substructure
and a 4 rotation core. Classic quantization is a good approximation to
a linear reality. But electrons and protons finally interact in 4
mixed rotation dimensions and all orbits are coupled. As coupling adds
new rotating masses to more than one rotation it is keen to believe
that these connections are still simple natural numbers. The problem
is the mismatch between rotating dimensions and Eigenvalues of the
energy that always has a feedback to charge (in fact the potential).
Axil: Polarized photons do the follow the same (1FC 2x2) orbits as the
mass in H*-H*. There is no such thing as LENR energy. It's all about
coupling orbits on 2x2 rotation dimensions.
J.W.
Am 09.11.19 um 17:59 schrieb [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>:
Axil—
Assuming a magnetic field is a dimension., like space, time and
angular momentum which occur in discrete quanta of their
respective known characteristics (seconds, meters, h/2pi angular
momentum, and B the magnetic field--quantized along with an
electric field at a quanta considerably below the average field
for the volume of an electron, ) then the relativistic electrons
with their momentum and intense local electric field could be in
fact be combining with the nearby magnetic quanta to form new
photons. These new photons are left in the empty 3D space to
gather as polariton condensates to conserve angular momentum spin
energy. The passing electron would necessarily slow down to,
loosing kinetic energy and linear momentum as well as some angular
momentum, both of which may be conserved in the reaction.
Planck was famous for speculating that the only real entities may
be fields—i.e., dimensional quanta known as fields to modern physics.
To handle this existence of quantized dimensions conceptually and
accurately, science needs a new mathematics similar to calculus
that can be cut off at some small amount (but not infinitesimal)
to match real data from experiments. Uncertainty could become an
idea of a past time dimension in the minds of humans and other
real entities that might exist elsewhere in space and time.
Finite element analyses that super computers can do may actually
already provide the new math suggested above. Even if they are
not capable of handling the calculations for actual quantum
dimensions, they could suggest what the real quantum dimensions
are by extrapolations to real data from real observations.
(Quarks with their 1/3 electric charges may really be electric
field quanta confined to a small volume of 3D space quanta.)
Bob Cook
*From:*Axil Axil <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, November 8, 2019 11:45:38 AM
*To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [Vo]:Science discoveries how LENR works
It was only a matter of time before science discovered the basic
process upon which LENR energy is generated. The few highly
capable LENR reactors produce Extreme ultraviolet radiation (EUV
or XUV) as their primary output energy product.
https://physicsworld.com/a/electrons-passing-over-nanophotonic-materials-could-create-synchrotron-like-light/
Electrons passing over nanophotonic materials could create
synchrotron-like light
https://physicsworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Illustration-of-passive-light-emission-635x216.jpg
Electron flyby: illustration of how encounters between
relativistic electrons and vacuum fluctuations can generate
X-rays. (Courtesy: Nicholas Rivera et al/Nature Physics)
The interaction between electrons and a rough metal surface
produce high energy photons derived from the vacuum. These photons
come from the vacuum as mediated by polariton condensation. This
experiment could be a proof of principle for the generation of
Hawking radiation from polariton condensation.
In Hawking radiation, the polariton condensate produces low
energy infrared photons as a "positive energy" product having a
positive frequency, but high energy EUV photons as "negative
energy" having a negative frequency. As in this case, zero vacuum
energy is balanced when negative vacuum energy is created to
offset positive vacuum energy production, but that negative vacuum
energy is not permanently sequestered by gravity.
The high energy EUV photons produced in high powered LENR reactors
like Rossi's SK reactor, Mills SunCell, and the SAFIRE project
could be generated as negative vacuum energy photons.
ReplyForward
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr.22
8910 Affoltern a.A.
044 760 14 18
079 246 36 06
