Holmlid new paper legwork by can *Title:* “Production of ultra-dense hydrogen H(0): A novel nuclear fuel”
Date: 26 March 2021 *Authors:* Leif Holmlid, Andrzej Kotarba, Pawel Stelmachowski. *Link:* https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319921008144?via%3Dihub#! Some LENR-relevant excerpts from the paper: [...] It is possible to have an energy output by forming H(0) from hydrogen gas. This condensation energy will easily be believed to be non-chemical thus nuclear due to its size (of the order of hundred times larger than normal chemical energy output). It may be a large part of the energy which is considered to be caused by so-called cold fusion, as suggested previously by Winterberg [6,7]. Other nuclear reactions in H(0) may be the main processes considered to be cold fusion, with very little of normal fusion products like 4He and neutrons out. So-called cold fusion according to Fleischmann and Pons [8] is probably due to the condensation reactions of H(0) as mentioned above and also due to the spontaneous nuclear processes which take place in H(0) [9]. Such spontaneous nuclear processes are similar to those induced by pulsed lasers [[10], [11], [12]] which do not give 4He and neutrons as products but instead give mesons, especially charged and neutral kaons [[13], [14], [15]]. Thus, these processes are not fusion processes. The mesons formed have lifetimes of less than 100 ns. Most often, it is the decay of the mesons which can be studied easily, giving high-accuracy lifetimes in agreement with those measured at large accelerators [16]. Since almost all mesons formed (kaons and pions) decay to muons which have a much longer lifetime of 2.20 μs, the muons have been detected easily [[12], [13], [14], [15],18], and also confirmed separately [15]. The sources of mesons and muons obtained in this way are the strongest that exist and they can be operated with high energy efficiency and at a low cost. These meson producing processes are very similar for H(0) and D(0). This means that many early experiments on cold fusion which aimed at finding the true contribution of fusion by comparing experiments using deuterium with similar experiments using ordinary hydrogen were meaningless. The nuclear reactions in H(0) are instead annihilation-like processes [19]. The tragic un-scientific processes which took place after the report of “cold fusion”, aimed to block all research on “cold fusion”, have damaged science and especially the reputation of science in society. Now when the pieces of knowledge of these processes are falling into place, it is time to acknowledge that only more science-based rationales can be used to solve such scientific problems, not denials and political or personal persecution. My comments In both the Holmlid and Mills technology, the key gateway into the LENR reaction is the creation of a superconducting nanoparticle. This superconductive seed triggers the conversion of electrons into tachyons that when condensed generate a false vacuum which in turn catalyzes the extraction of energy from the vacuum. A side non energy producing reaction generates transmutation via a tachyon catalyzed naked singularity as described by Witten. Connecting energy production with transmutation is the biggest misconception that has undercut the understanding of LENR. These two concurrent processes are completely independent related to energy production. Energy production only occurs when the condensate is terminated via a Bosenova. On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:07 AM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:20 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Bob, >> >> Yes. Lets hear where this comes from. >> >> IMO this is completely fake insofar as it relates to Shoulders' work. >> > > Reminds me of "rods" > > https://www.thecryptocrew.com/2015/05/rods-real-or-bugs.html >
