https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKf-6d1Olf4
This is a VEGA video segment from a DAVE experiment analysed by Bob Greenyer with 30 times slow motion. On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 3:45 AM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Strange radiation is a self amplifying chain reaction that is self > contained. SR just needs a source of electrons to grow. The electrons are > without charge and form a lattice which implies that there is no internal > movement as in a plasmid. Consistent with the Higgs abyss hypothesis, the > EVO only requires the most insubstantial superconductive seed to initiate > growth, but once growth begins, it continues self sustained in the presence > of a free electrons feed stock until instability sets in and the EVO > explodes. > > However, if the source of free electrons dry up, the EVO becomes dormant > and can survive indefinitely until additional free electron feedstock again > becomes available. > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:34 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Presented now is a video that shows the energy release from an EVO at >> termination via the Bosenova. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBQYArxDrdg >> >> Bosenova production in slow motion >> VEGA - 240fps + 8x slow motion >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VuO7iYzyT8&t=155s >> >> >> The production of EVO in slow motion. >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rU7v4Yy_QGw >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:05 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Naked singularities are not related to gravitational black holes. These >>> micro black holes are a consequence of tachyon condensation. Ashoke Sen >>> took the fear out of tachyons for physicists when he characterized tachyon >>> condensation. In the late 1990s, Ashoke Sen conjectured that the tachyons >>> carried by open strings attached to D-branes in string theory reflect the >>> instability of the D-branes with respect to their complete annihilation. >>> The total energy carried by these tachyons has been calculated in string >>> field theory; it agrees with the total energy of the D-branes, and all >>> other tests have confirmed Sen's conjecture as well. Tachyons therefore >>> became an active area of interest in the early 2000s. OK, so >>> open-string tachyons and closed-string tachyons in twisted sectors are more >>> or less understood by now. Physicists no longer panic or abandon the theory >>> when they see a tachyon. Instead, they calmly interpret these tachyons as >>> sources of instabilities – instability that annihilate objects or whole >>> chunks of spacetime and that may (but don't necessarily have to) lead to a >>> new stable world with some interesting objects that may be left over. For >>> this reason, it was Ashoke Sen and his apprentices such as Edward Witten >>> who unified nothingness and somethingness in physics – i.e. in string >>> theory (because no other theory can achieve similar unifications) – and who >>> discovered new perspectives on the somethingness in between and that's my >>> explanation why both Sen and Witten deserves their $3 million Breakthrough >>> prizes. I am interested in relating the abstractions of string theory >>> to real world engineering applications. I want to know the ways and means >>> of how these naked singularities annihilate objects or whole chunks of >>> spacetime and that may lead to new stable conditions with some interesting >>> transformed objects that may be left over. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:18 PM Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Holmlid new paper legwork by can >>>> >>>> *Title:* “Production of ultra-dense hydrogen H(0): A novel nuclear >>>> fuel” >>>> >>>> Date: >>>> >>>> 26 March 2021 >>>> >>>> *Authors:* Leif Holmlid, Andrzej Kotarba, Pawel Stelmachowski. >>>> >>>> *Link:* >>>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319921008144?via%3Dihub#! >>>> >>>> >>>> Some LENR-relevant excerpts from the paper: >>>> >>>> [...] It is possible to have an energy output by forming H(0) from >>>> hydrogen gas. This condensation energy will easily be believed to be >>>> non-chemical thus nuclear due to its size (of the order of hundred times >>>> larger than normal chemical energy output). It may be a large part of the >>>> energy which is considered to be caused by so-called cold fusion, as >>>> suggested previously by Winterberg [6,7]. Other nuclear reactions in H(0) >>>> may be the main processes considered to be cold fusion, with very little of >>>> normal fusion products like 4He and neutrons out. >>>> So-called cold fusion according to Fleischmann and Pons [8] is probably >>>> due to the condensation reactions of H(0) as mentioned above and also due >>>> to the spontaneous nuclear processes which take place in H(0) [9]. Such >>>> spontaneous nuclear processes are similar to those induced by pulsed lasers >>>> [[10], [11], [12]] which do not give 4He and neutrons as products but >>>> instead give mesons, especially charged and neutral kaons [[13], [14], >>>> [15]]. Thus, these processes are not fusion processes. The mesons formed >>>> have lifetimes of less than 100 ns. Most often, it is the decay of the >>>> mesons which can be studied easily, giving high-accuracy lifetimes in >>>> agreement with those measured at large accelerators [16]. Since almost all >>>> mesons formed (kaons and pions) decay to muons which have a much longer >>>> lifetime of 2.20 μs, the muons have been detected easily [[12], [13], [14], >>>> [15],18], and also confirmed separately [15]. The sources of mesons and >>>> muons obtained in this way are the strongest that exist and they can be >>>> operated with high energy efficiency and at a low cost. >>>> >>>> These meson producing processes are very similar for H(0) and D(0). >>>> This means that many early experiments on cold fusion which aimed at >>>> finding the true contribution of fusion by comparing experiments using >>>> deuterium with similar experiments using ordinary hydrogen were >>>> meaningless. The nuclear reactions in H(0) are instead annihilation-like >>>> processes [19]. The tragic un-scientific processes which took place after >>>> the report of “cold fusion”, aimed to block all research on “cold fusion”, >>>> have damaged science and especially the reputation of science in society. >>>> Now when the pieces of knowledge of these processes are falling into place, >>>> it is time to acknowledge that only more science-based rationales can be >>>> used to solve such scientific problems, not denials and political or >>>> personal persecution. >>>> >>>> >>>> My comments >>>> >>>> In both the Holmlid and Mills technology, the key gateway into the LENR >>>> reaction is the creation of a superconducting nanoparticle. This >>>> superconductive seed triggers the conversion of electrons into tachyons >>>> that when condensed generate a false vacuum which in turn catalyzes the >>>> extraction of energy from the vacuum. >>>> >>>> A side non energy producing reaction generates transmutation via a >>>> tachyon catalyzed naked singularity as described by Witten. Connecting >>>> energy production with transmutation is the biggest misconception that has >>>> undercut the understanding of LENR. These two concurrent processes are >>>> completely independent related to energy production. >>>> >>>> Energy production only occurs when the condensate is terminated via a >>>> Bosenova. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 11:07 AM Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:20 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Bob, >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes. Lets hear where this comes from. >>>>>> >>>>>> IMO this is completely fake insofar as it relates to Shoulders' work. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Reminds me of "rods" >>>>> >>>>> https://www.thecryptocrew.com/2015/05/rods-real-or-bugs.html >>>>> >>>>
