Speaking of Ni isotopes... Axil mentions Ni64 and Ni62 in this LENR context 
... Is it significant that the Higgs mass is close to twice the average mass of 
nickel? An alloy of copper and nickel can be produce which is essentially 
identical in mass to twice Higgs.

Coincidence of irrelevant ? 

There does not appear to be good commentary on the mass similarity of Higgs 
vis-a-vis a copper nickel alloy - at least that I can find. But if this mass 
value is/was significant, the "old guard" in LENR should look more closely at 
tellurium... especially alloyed with nickel or nickel-copper. 

That is because a second glaring coincidence along these lines is that the 
mass-energy of an isotope of tellurium being almost the same value as Higgs (~ 
125 GeV) and twice that of ideal nickel or copper-nickel. 

Best of all - Low power laser irradiation seems to be a way to exploit the 
'coincidence'. See below.

This could point the way to actually being able to engineer the Higgs boson 
despite the low lifetime.

https://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-have-discovered-a-new-kind-of-higgs-relative-sitting-on-the-tabletop
 

    Axil Axil wrote:  
 Particle physicists have an issue with our universe, it is not natural. This 
wildly unnatural universe is at the bottom of our cold fusion experience. The 
improbable existence of our universe is what makes cold fusion possible. Our 
reality is setting on the knife's edge of existence. A minimal increase of the 
Higgs field will push the universe into disaster. Our universe is within a 
hair's breadth from destruction [snip].. the nickel isotopes became more 
enriched in Ni62 and Ni64. Ni61 also showed a great deviation from the normal 
isotopic distribution. These isotopic shifts showed redistribution of neutrons 
among the nickel atoms, yet no neutrons were ever detected during these reactor 
runs. ;

The old guard cold fusion meme cannot explain how this change in isotopic 
distribution could happen. The fusion nuclear reaction does not affect 
isotopes, it only affects the number of protons and neutrons inside a nucleus. 
As I have shown previously, this change in isotopic distribution comes from 
slight changes in the masses of the up and down quarks in protons and neutrons.
  

Reply via email to