Please foklks,
There is no Higgs mass as there is no Higgs particle.
CERN could find nothing in the range of 300 GeV .. 8TeV where the Higgs
was expected.
So CERN did use a so called "spare particle" that first has been seen
around 1998. It's a fat proton thus a real particle not a virtual as
needed for the Higgs...
J.W.
On 30.07.2022 23:19, Jones Beene wrote:
Speaking of Ni isotopes... Axil mentions Ni64 and Ni62 in this LENR
context ... Is it significant that the Higgs mass is close to twice
the average mass of nickel? An alloy of copper and nickel can be
produce which is essentially identical in mass to twice Higgs.
Coincidence of irrelevant ?
There does not appear to be good commentary on the mass similarity of
Higgs vis-a-vis a copper nickel alloy - at least that I can find. But
if this mass value is/was significant, the "old guard" in LENR should
look more closely at tellurium... especially alloyed with nickel or
nickel-copper.
That is because a second glaring coincidence along these lines is that
the mass-energy of an isotope of tellurium being almost the same value
as Higgs (~ 125 GeV) and twice that of ideal nickel or copper-nickel.
Best of all - Low power laser irradiation seems to be a way to exploit
the 'coincidence'. See below.
This could point the way to actually being able to engineer the Higgs
boson despite the low lifetime.
https://www.sciencealert.com/researchers-have-discovered-a-new-kind-of-higgs-relative-sitting-on-the-tabletop
Axil Axil wrote:
Particle physicists have an issue with our universe, it is not
natural. This wildly unnatural universe is at the bottom of our cold
fusion experience. The improbable existence of our universe is what
makes cold fusion possible. Our reality is setting on the knife's edge
of existence. A minimal increase of the Higgs field will push the
universe into disaster. Our universe is within a hair's breadth from
destruction [snip].. the nickel isotopes became more enriched in Ni62
and Ni64. Ni61 also showed a great deviation from the normal isotopic
distribution. These isotopic shifts showed redistribution of neutrons
among the nickel atoms, yet no neutrons were ever detected during
these reactor runs. ;
The old guard cold fusion meme cannot explain how this change in
isotopic distribution could happen. The fusion nuclear reaction does
not affect isotopes, it only affects the number of protons and
neutrons inside a nucleus. As I have shown previously, this change in
isotopic distribution comes from slight changes in the masses of the
up and down quarks in protons and neutrons.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
