In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:16:18 -0500: Hi Jed, [snip] >Robin <mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> wrote: > >I was looking at https://phl.upr.edu/projects/habitable-exoplanets-catalog >> and it occurred to me that in order to reach an exoplanet we are probably >> going to need to be able to harness >> anti-gravity/inertia-less propulsion. > > >What makes you think such things are possible? Is there any evidence for >them?
The evidence of my own eyes, and the fact that the US government has admitted that UFOs (UAP)exist - https://science.nasa.gov/uap. UFOs have been observed to perform "impossible" maneuvers. > >They seem like pure science fiction to me. They always do, until you have seen it for yourself. Besides, everything is SF until our understanding advances a little further, and it becomes science fact. The Earth going around the Sun was treated as SF for hundreds of years, even for some time after the truth became evident. BTW I think a primitive form of inertial dampening may be built into some modern fighter jets, because sometimes you see a spherical "bubble" of condensation form around the cockpit of modern fighters when they perform an extreme high-G turn. The fact that it's use is limited to such instants implies that it consumes a lot of energy, which is why I say that it's probably a primitive form, unless someone else can come up with a more mundane explanation for the bubble? [snip] Cloud storage:- Unsafe, Slow, Expensive ...pick any three.
