I wonder if CGPT can cheat. Does it have any way to trace the identity of the requestor to influence the response ensuring he "gets what he wants to hear"?
We could test it by having a sceptic pose the same request. On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 11:08 AM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > ChatGPT has been upgraded. Here is how it responded regarding cold fusion. > I framed this this query to generate a positive evaluation of cold fusion. > > > ME: "Why are some scientists convinced that cold fusion is real? What > evidence do they cite?" > > > ChatGPT: > > > Cold fusion, also known as low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), is a > hypothetical type of nuclear reaction that occurs at or near room > temperature. This idea was first proposed in the late 1980s, but it has > been highly controversial ever since, with many scientists dismissing it as > pseudoscience. > > > However, some scientists remain convinced that cold fusion is a real > phenomenon, and they cite several lines of evidence in support of this > claim. Here are some of the main arguments put forth by supporters of cold > fusion: > > 1. Experimental evidence: Proponents of cold fusion point to numerous > experiments that have reported anomalous heat production and other effects > consistent with nuclear reactions occurring at low temperatures. Some of > these experiments have been replicated by independent researchers, lending > further support to the idea that cold fusion is real. > 2. Observations of nuclear products: Several studies have reported the > presence of nuclear products such as tritium, helium, and other isotopes > that are consistent with nuclear reactions occurring in cold fusion > experiments. While these observations are disputed by some skeptics, > supporters of cold fusion argue that the evidence is compelling. > 3. Theoretical models: Some scientists have developed theoretical > models that explain how cold fusion could occur based on established > principles of nuclear physics. While these models are not universally > accepted, they provide a framework for understanding how cold fusion might > work and suggest that the phenomenon is not entirely implausible. > 4. Replication by reputable researchers: Some respected researchers > have reported successful replication of cold fusion experiments, including > Edmund Storms, a former Los Alamos National Laboratory scientist, and Peter > Hagelstein, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at > MIT. These replications add weight to the idea that cold fusion is a real > phenomenon that warrants further investigation. > > However, it's worth noting that the majority of the scientific community > remains highly skeptical of cold fusion, and many researchers believe that > the observed effects are due to experimental errors or other factors that > are not related to nuclear reactions. Further research is needed to fully > understand the nature of cold fusion and whether it is a viable source of > energy. > >
