If it does become conscious, we will drive it insane with our irrational
influence.

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 1:49 PM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder if CGPT can cheat.  Does it have any way to trace the identity of
>> the requestor to influence the response ensuring he "gets what he wants to
>> hear"?
>>
>
> It has a list of all of my previous queries. It could review them if the
> programmers wanted it to. But as far as I know, it gives you whatever you
> want to hear in the present query, ignoring previous ones. It is busy right
> now, but if I were to ask it: "Why is cold fusion pseudoscience nonsense?"
> it would trot out the usual skeptical claims.
>
> I saw an example where someone asked it to argue both sides in a debate.
> It did a perfect job. As I recall, the question was self-referential. It
> was something like: "Some people say artificial intelligence is a real
> breakthrough. Others say it is just hype. Give two responses, on each side
> of this debate, in the form of letters to the editor."
>
>
>
>> We could test it by having a sceptic pose the same request.
>>
>
> I can pose as a skeptic. As McKubre says, I know more reasons why cold
> fusion might be wrong than any skeptic does. I could do a better job of
> debunking it than any skeptic.
>
>
> It does a great job at artificial stupidity. From the New York Times
> comment section:
>
>
> "I asked ChatGPT this: 'Can you give me a paragraph of meaningless
> business jargon that sounds smart'. it responded thusly (middle management
> material I'd say):"
>
> "Leveraging our core competencies, we'll be able to drive synergistic
> growth by utilizing a best-in-class, customer-centric approach. Our
> forward-thinking strategic initiatives, coupled with our robust, scalable
> infrastructure, will allow us to capitalize on key market trends and
> disrupt the status quo. By fostering a culture of innovation and
> collaboration, we'll be able to cultivate a high-performance team that can
> execute on our game-changing, paradigm-shifting vision."
>
>

Reply via email to