For those who used it in the first few days, when bot moderation was not installed properly, of right now, if it is jailbroken, GPT works just as well as a very smart human. With a few tweeks (like making it use math AI, wolfram alpha which surpassed humans decades ago, or NN, or scan OCR), it easily overcomes the vast majority of people. So, why isn't it considered AGI right now? If you let it hold memory of conversations with a single person, and let it hold memory (there is a very small cap of around 4thousand free tokens, which is like 30kb) it is already supersmart.
- [Vo]:Chat Gpt as a tool to discuss hard topics Stefan Israelsson Tampe
- Re: [Vo]:Chat Gpt as a tool to discuss hard t... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Chat Gpt as a tool to discuss ha... Stefan Israelsson Tampe
- [Vo]:Shouldn't we consider the free chat GPT3... Boom
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we consider the free c... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we consider the fr... Robin
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we consider th... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we consid... Boom
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we consid... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't we co... Robin
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't w... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't w... Sean True
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't w... Jed Rothwell
- Re: [Vo]:Shouldn't w... Alain Sepeda