Nick Palmer wrote:
I took the liberty of correcting/editing about four obvious voice
transcription errors in the piece...
Thanks!
For some reason, voice input works badly in the Wikipedia interface.
It makes more mistakes than usual. I should do all text preparation
in Microsoft Word or the dedicated NaturallySpeaking editor, and then
transfer the text, but that is tedious.
Perhaps we should make a serious effort to tone this article down and
make it semi-acceptable to the skeptics. I had such fun writing it
after while I decided I would not bother going to the motions to
anticipate their objections. Now they will tear it to pieces, and my
efforts will be wasted. But I have preserved the text and I may use
it some day elsewhere.
Here is a funny, wicked, right-on description of Wikipedia, published today:
http://www.wired.com/news/columns/0,70670-0.html?tw=wn_index_3
- Jed
