Stranger and stranger. So how do you qualify the pilots, if not suicide pilots?
Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Berry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:13 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: No Thermite ? > That's my point exactly. > > What I am saying has solid evidence to back it up, and you counter with > 'Bush is a twit'. > Which while obviously true, no one is claiming he did any of the technical > stuff, members of the intelligence community did that. > Further no one is claiming there were suicide pilots on the planes, of any > race, you just show how little you've looked into it to say something like > that. > > It's only a theory if there isn't absolute proof. > > On 2/22/07, Zell, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Perhaps the answer lies in the Monty Python sketch in which a building >> is maintained by hypnosis. >> >> The problem with conspiracies is the obvious contradiction with real >> world government competence. Take a good look >> at Iraq or the intellectual depth of Bush and reason accordingly. I >> don't see any reason why conspirators should haul >> Sacks of thermite and ignite them in synchrony with ( extremely >> reliable) suicide bombers - when explosives would do a >> better job. More than that, I doubt the WTC buildings were as well >> built as the Empire State building - when it survived >> A collision with a WWII vintage bomber. >> >> >
