"Charlie, Charlie, Charlie Brown" (sorry couldn't resist), why don't you just 
try this scheme with a single resistor and diode in a good Faraday cage rather 
than spamming us with it regularly?

Such a prototype wouldn't cost much compared to my Sterling engine + heat pump 
scheme ;-)

Michel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles M. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 2:07 AM
Subject: [Vo]: Diode array 070304


> The Johnson noise produced in resistors  is A.C. which 
> will have an average voltage of zero. A group of resistors 
> will have act like one equivalent resistor. Diodes in 
> consistent alignment parallel will conduct more Johnson 
> noise current and less voltage when the internal electrons 
> move from the cathode to the anode. A rectified residue of 
> Johnson noise power will be aggregated on the buss sheets 
> that merges the outputs of all the consistently aligned 
> diodes, The anodes connected to one buss and the cathodes 
> connected to a second buss. Aggregated D.C. power can be 
> tapped from the busses while an equivalent amount of 
> ambient thermal energy is absorbed. Last I heard, Paul 
> agrees with this design. IIRC Jones Beene rejects it 
> without comment, and I agree with Paul's further 
> deductions that a resistor / LED array would convert 
> ambient heat into light and Paul's other approach that a 
> ambient IR photocell would convert ambient heat into D.C. 
> electrical power where an extensive cathode would be the 
> negative terminal. I believe that the diode array is the 
> most practical method. I do not believe that lenses or 
> mirrors will concentrate ambient IR.
> 
> I applied for Branson's prize without spelling out that 
> the way to use apply diode arrays  to CO2 reduction would 
> be to use diode arrays as air conditioners in tropical 
> climates and use the resultant electrical power to 
> decompose CO2; I mentioned that air conditioners would 
> yield electrical power but I neglected to immediately tie 
> this attribute to CO2  decomposition. I mailed my 
> narritive in early Feb and have not received an 
> aknowlegement or reply.
> 
> Aloha,
> 
> Charlie 
>

Reply via email to