Michel Jullian wrote:
The highly OU commercial ambient air energy pumping devices I was
talking about are those residential heating heat pumps we have been
discussing in the 'loop closed' thread, they commonly reach COPs of
4 (1000W out for 250W in, the excess coming from ambient air).
I thought this thread was a joke. A heat pump is NOT over unity.
Using old-fashioned terminology, a heat pump moves heat from a cold
"reservoir" to a hot one. When you drive a heat engine with the heat
from the hot reservoir, the heat engine produces less energy overall
than the heat pump consumed.
The "COP" of 4 refers to the amount of heat energy moved versus the
amount expended by the machine, but you cannot move that same heat
back the other direction with a heat engine and get back 4 times
input, because the hot reservoir is only a little warmer than the
cold one, and Carnot efficiency is low.
Let me give an imaginary example with round numbers. Suppose you live
in Florida where you need to heat a house only a little more than the
surroundings. You run a gasoline powered heat pump -- a very
efficient heat pump with a COP of 6. It converts 20% of the starting
energy into air conditioner power, which then moves 5 * 20% into the
house = 120% of the original fuel.
You can burn 1000 joules worth of fuel in the house, or use the same
amount of fuel in the heat pump to move 1200 joules of heat from the
surroundings into the house. But, the temperature difference between
the house and the surrounding is 5 deg C (6 deg C with the heat
pump), and when you attach a heat pump to the house and let the heat
flow through it, it is only 1% efficient, so the 1200 joules converts
to 12 joules of useful work. It is physically impossible for any heat
engine to convert the heat back into 1000 joules of work, or more.
If you only want to make the hot reservoir a little warmer than the
surroundings, a heat pump can achieve very high C.O.P.s of 10 or
more, but in no case can you reverse the process with a heat engine
and get more out than you put in.
- Jed
- Re: [Vo]: Proof of capturing ambient temperature energy Jed Rothwell
-