I am not pressing you for an answer Ed, but I Googled for your book soon to be 
published you advertised here the other day: "The Science of Low Energy Nuclear 
Reaction" and found its home page here:

http://www.worldscibooks.com/physics/6425.html 

It says "Pub. date: Scheduled Fall 2007", hopefully it is not too late to 
correct it for such errors?

Or have you had it proofread by an electrochemist maybe?

I imagine you hadn't taken such precaution for the paper you submitted last 
year to Thermochimica Acta whose terminology of title and abstract we are 
discussing (haven't read it further yet BTW, waiting until we agree on the 
definition of electrolysis since that's what the paper is about). A pity since 
the thermochemists who reviewed that paper probably read no further than the 
title and abstract before rejecting it, whereas apart from terminology the 
paper may be quite good on the merits!

Michel


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 7:05 AM
Subject: [Vo]: Ed Storm's confusion (was Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. 
Michael Shermer)


> Do you still not see it Ed?
> 
> Michel
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michel Jullian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer
> 
> 
>> I'll let you find the error yourself it's quite obvious. Same error in the 
>> two quotes.
>> 
>> Michel
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Edmund Storms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold Fusion skeptic Dr. Michael Shermer
>> ...
>>>> -> Ed
>>>> The title of your paper:
>>>> "Anomalous Heat Produced by Electrolysis of Palladium using a Heavy-Water 
>>>> Electrolyte"
>>>> comprises a surprising confusion in electrochemical terms.
>>>> At least I thought it was only in the title until I read the abstract:
>>>> "a sample of palladium foil was electrolyzed as the cathode in D2O+LiOD"
>>>> Can you see your error Ed? I am just making sure you are like Jed and 
>>>> myself the humble type who gladly admit their errors and even go out of 
>>>> their way to do so, as a real scientist should, unlike two other famous CF 
>>>> researchers we know, who would rather die :)
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't see what your problem is.
>>> 
>>> Ed
>>> -
>>>> Michel
>> 
>>
>

Reply via email to