Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace, my time here is to spread truth and logic to a dark world.
OK, it appears you really aren't here trolling for money then.
Indeed that is correct. From the start of this research I have posted at the top
of all my Wiki pages, "Note This project and research requires no funding or
payments of any kind. No payment is requested nor has any ever been accepted for
this project and research. This researcher has the necessary equipment and money
to continue this project and research." -->
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:PaulL
My signature at overunity.com, "Smoking Gun will be posted at
http://groups.google.com/group/energymover Conventional physics acknowledges
Magnetic entropy. Megawatts of energy exchanges occur in certain magnetic
materials. Normally magnetic entropy converts to lattice entropy as heat, but
it's possible to capture such radiation given the correct circumstances &
material. Energy exchanges occurring in 1cc @ 100KHz +-Bsat could power a small
city. This research is based on conventional physics in a detailed step-by-step
manner. Computer simulation analysis reveals what occurs within magnetic
material on an atomic scale. THIS RESEARCH IS ENTIRELY SELF-FUNDED. Not a cent
was accepted, nor will any be accepted. This is for the World! Learn about this
science & help at http://groups.google.com/group/energymover";
Take note of the above upper case highlighted text that says, "THIS RESEARCH IS
ENTIRELY SELF-FUNDED."
No offense to readers, but how baffling to date modern so-called
society still passively teaches and encourages one to save face rather
than truth and logic. I would think that truth and logic should rule,
but then again this is a world dominated by emotions.
Undisputed fact still remains that it is simple to capture ambient
energy with present technology. My long time offer still remains. Put
ones $$$ where their mouth is and I'll hand you a simple device that
generates "free energy" without any source of power other than from
ambient temperature. Present task still remains to complete an
appreciably small device to capture significant ambient energy.
Say, isn't the above just plain old not so thinly veiled solicitous
spam? How many times does the above have to be repeated here before it
becomes spam?
Perhaps until people (hint hint) will begin to graciously admit their errors so
others of lesser scientific knowledge may make a valid conclusion. :-) Rather
the common tactic appears to be "hit & run."
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
