Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Please allow me to enlighten you brother. It is not difficult to build
a machine that captures such ambient energy, period! The challenge is
in building a machine that can capture significant ambient energy
without building a ridiculously large machine. It will require nano
scale technology or darn clever macro scale design. It's the later
that I am working on, and will succeed single handedly.
Then you should have no need to waste your time with trifling
discussion. Go forth and invent ... the world is in great need.
&
StifflerScientific wrote:
> I would love to answer, but I think Bill Beaty might be a tad upset with me.
>
> Just consider me one of those below average intellect people and ignore what
> I say and build you device based on your 'almighty correct theory'?
Horace, my time here is to spread truth and logic to a dark world.
No offense to readers, but how baffling to date modern so-called society still
passively teaches and encourages one to save face rather than truth and logic.
I would think that truth and logic should rule, but then again this is a world
dominated by emotions.
Undisputed fact still remains that it is simple to capture ambient energy with
present technology. My long time offer still remains. Put ones $$$ where their
mouth is and I'll hand you a simple device that generates "free energy" without
any source of power other than from ambient temperature. Present task still
remains to complete an appreciably small device to capture significant ambient
energy.
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
