--- Horace Heffner wrote: > OK, show me power measurements that were either > posted or on the web site.
The web site is copyrighted and closed as of now. I suspect it will open back up, as soon as DrS. finds the necessary time. The PR advantage of an open and maintained website is not worth the lost time at this juncture. It would be lovely if he had a webmaster but he does not. Why should he spent valuable time appeasing skeptics when this could end-up being one of the most important anomalies since Madame Curie's exposed film? The experiment demands attention - not addressing misguided skepticism. > I don't have to assume anything. It is up to the > claimant to provide evidence. Hello Horace. There is NO CLAIMANT here. DrS reported some anomalies by video to a wide audience, but all of a sudden, between CR4 and CR5, he made what seems to be a major breakthrough. In the meantime all he received was dare I say "mean-time", tacky criticism, and little insight. All of the optimistic commentary, and the claims of something "very special" can be laid at my door if this does not pan out. He is not seeking financial gain or recognition, but was at the start seeking positive input and insight, and when that all turned not only negative, but hateful (website attacks) then he consequently withdrew into a shell so as to devote valuable time to pushing this experiment to the next level. That would also indicate that he is not going to waste time lining up suppliers, etc in order to supply kits - at least not for the time-being. Kits may come if and when a plateau is reached, but he is still ascending. > Deflation Fusion is a speculation and clearly > labeled so in the article title. This is a report of an anomaly, not a claim, and was not put out to the public for the purpose of collecting insults to the effect that the man cannot measure power. You are free to ignore it if you have no positive input. > It could be wrong or right or partially right. Couldn't have said it better myself... Jones
