Instead of laboring over cathode treatment in random replication results for gas discharge or electrolysis CF reactions, why not use "Muonic Altered Water: MAW, that can be obtained by bombarding an electrical discharge in Steam in front of a Muon Source, like the Los Alamos Meson Physics Facility (LAMPF) that used 800 MeV protons (less than the 936 MeV rest energy of the proton) hitting a copper target? Extinct?
Potassium compounds or Argon gas Etc., also? The "secret ingredient" in the Yusmar water that Scott Little at Earthtech wondered about in the early days? On Dec 3, 2007 11:38 PM, Frederick Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An extensive treatment of the interaction of water on solid surfaces > (about 10 megabytes) gives insight on how a "Muonic Entity" could catalyze > CF reactions on the cathode of > an electrolysis cell. It also touches on the effect of oxygen wrt the > water interaction with > the surfaces. > > > http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~wchen/Madey_page/Full_Publications/PDF/madey_SSR_1987_T.pdf > > On Dec 3, 2007 10:38 PM, Frederick Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Isn't it strange that Ed Storms' paper reports no gammas either, yet the > > radiation implies particle energies in the MeV range? > > Note the effect of oxygen and hydrocarbons in the Storms experiment > > where one would expect the quasi-stable entity to be found. (Argon in the > > O2 ?) A deuteron or proton impacting a heavier (higher Z) atom electron > > cloud containing the entity would capture the entity and effect CF, allowing > > the entity to be released to continue working as a catalyst. > > > > On Dec 3, 2007 7:31 PM, Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Well - there should lots of strong gammas then, for Correa to confirm > > > his specualtion, no? > > > > > > Not to mention, it would be nice if Correa had had a single > > > independent > > > replication in all these years, and/or could quote from another source > > > than his own work or Aspden ;-) > > > > > > Nevertheless - he has probably seen something of an anomaly but will > > > we > > > ever know for sure? > > > > > > J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Frederick Sparber wrote: > > > > P.N. Correa speaks on an anomaly. > > > > > > > > *http://web.globalserve.net/~lambdac/PwrfromAEemissions.html* > > > > > > > > * "In a speculative fashion, it is indeed interesting to remark that > > > the > > > > PAGD energies associated with emitted cathode ions are in the range > > > > needed for electron-positron pair creation. Significantly, the study > > > of > > > > narrow, nonrelativistic positron peaks and of electron-positron > > > > coincidences in heavy ion collisions has led to the identification > > > of > > > > low-mass "photonium" resonances in the 1 to 2 MeV range (lowest > > > > prediction at ~1.2 MeV (99)), which have been theorized as possible > > > e-e+ > > > > quasi-bound continuum states of a pure electromagnetic nature > > > (98-99), > > > > suggesting the existence of a new (ultra-nuclear and infra-atomic) > > > scale > > > > for QED interactions (99). Lastly, it has been formally shown that > > > pair > > > > production can be supported by a photon field in a nonstationary > > > medium > > > > and in a threshold-free manner (ie for any electromagnetic wave > > > > frequency) (100)." > > > > * > > > > On Dec 3, 2007 7:48 AM, Frederick Sparber <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Jones. > > > > > > > > A bound state of e- e+ e- (about 10^ -12 % according to CRC > > > > tables) is known. > > > > > > > > With a mass about 207 times that of the electron and about 0.5MeV > > > > they could > > > > make a burn spot on the center of your old TV CRT before they > > > came > > > > up with the bent gun. > > > > > > > > OTOH, a 1/207 fractional hydrino orbit of 2800 eV would be a > > > hefty > > > > energy release if > > > > they are in potassium or argon. No? > > > > > > > > Fred > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
