A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and force
the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this type have been
seen before. The process of overcoming them is iterative, lengthy,
expensive, and private. It is reasonable to believe that such interaction is
ongoing and necessary to protect investors and prospective partners. Legal
action may follow, which would make interesting theater.
Mike Carrell
----- Original Message -----
From: "OrionWorks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "vortex-l" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:31 PM
Subject: [Vo]:IPKat - weblog: The continuing incredible adventures of Dr.
Randell Mills
An unfavorable review of recent BLP patent activity over in UK. The
blog also includes excerpts from the UK patent office. Apparently, Dr.
Mills legal team was unsuccessful in persuading the UK Patent Office
of the validity of the hydrino theory behind their patent
applications.
See:
http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2008/04/continuing-incredible-adventures-of-dr.html
http://tinyurl.com/5tx86x
Not sure if this latest legal salvo hurts BLP seriously or not. Would
enjoy comments from the vort readership regarding their view of the
matter.
Funny graphic is attached, at Dr. Mills expense. Reminds me a bit of
Dr. Seuss's style.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
________________________________________________________________________
This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T.
Department.
