>From Mike Carrell: > A standard tactic of patent examiners is deny and cite objections and force > the applicant to overcome the objections. Objections of this type have been > seen before. The process of overcoming them is iterative, lengthy, > expensive, and private. It is reasonable to believe that such interaction is > ongoing and necessary to protect investors and prospective partners. Legal > action may follow, which would make interesting theater. > > Mike Carrell
Hi Mike, Is the new "solid fuel" process commercially viable? The implication over at the BLP web site has been that the new-and-improved process has been proven experimentally to self-generate through well-known chemical manufacturing processes. If this really is an authentic breakthrough in how to sustain the critical regenerative process to produce excess energy couldn't BLP & lawyers simply patent the process that generates the excess heat and, well, sort of gloss over (at least for now) the alleged theory behind it? Hasn't experimental evidence always trumped what theoretical explanation may currently be in vogue? Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
