Thomas won't get an A then? ;) Michel
----- Original Message ----- From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 11:24 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:responce to the IPKat - weblog > Tomis, > > It's 'RandEll' not 'RandAll'. > > <sigh> > > T > > On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Terry Blanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> <slaps head> >> >> Terry >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 1:20 AM, thomas malloy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Terry Blanton wrote: >> > >> > >> > > Thomis, >> > > >> > > It's 'Randell Mills'. He does not get an 'A'. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Randell doesn't get an A, what does that mean? The questions are: does >> his >> > reactor produce the amount of energy that he says it does, and can his >> > processes produce novel, and useful materials. If the answer to either of >> > these questions is yes, than his critics can go soak their heads. If his >> > techniques contradict the laws of physics, then it's the laws of physics >> > that have to change. The people who believe other wise have graduate >> > degrees. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > --- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! -- >> > http://www.usfamily.net/mkt-freepromo.html --- >> > >> > >> >
