Less government on the individual. MORE on the corporation. and lets remove this political fiction of coorp as person, please!
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Remi Cornwall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A plague on both their houses! > > The less government the better. Trust your constitution that's why it was > written. > > New energy will empower people to self-reliance. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 September 2008 16:08 > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: [Vo]:OFF TOPIC News of the bailout > > ----- Original Message ---- > > ... apparently Remi does not remember the infamous Keating Five - > > > ... from the net, a little "refresher" lesson in how recent political > history has this nagging tendency to repeat itself every new generation: > > John McCain & The Ghost of Keating Five > > posted last week by Ari Berman > > Back in the 1980s, when the US faced a major savings & loan crisis, > John McCain intervened to protect S&L magnate Charles Keating - a > major McCain donor and friend--from federal regulators. McCain was > later rebuked by the Senate Ethics Committee for "poor judgement" and > embarrassed by the $112,000 in campaign contributions, trips and gifts > he accepted from Keating. Following the entanglement, McCain became a > born-again reformer and tried to scrub the Keating episode from his > resume. > > http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters/361711/john_mccain_the_ghost_ > of_keating_five > > In fact - it has been reported that Wiki was under intense pressure from > McCain operatives when the "new" S&L Scandal become issue numeror uno in the > public's view - to have the pictures removed from the Wiki entry ... IOW > even if they knew they could not rewrite the history of the indent (but were > able to tone down some of the rhetoric) they did not want the actual > "picture" of McCain there - as apparently that was too inflamatory !!! > > ... or else some of the expected McCain supporters don't read much but are > impressed with visual images? > > > >
