Yeah, what MJ said: neodymium. I misspelled it. Well, after many nights of cogitation, I think I finally understand what Steorn is saying. Their claim is that magnetic force is time variant. This is a remarkable claim.
Energy is force applied over a distance and is time invariant. It doesn't matter if it takes you a second or a year to lift the bucket of water, the energy expended is the same (except for higher order effects which we will ignore here). Steorn says that the energy expended to separate magnets varies with the time you spend doing the separating. I believe this would be a violation of the laws of thermo. I am trying to come up with an experiment that we can perform with our equpment. Terry On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:11 AM, OrionWorks <svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Terry sez: > >>> Invest in niobium mining, young man! > >> Neodymnium? > > Neodymnium! Neodymnium! Neodymnium! Neodymnium! > > BTW, neodymnium does not come up on my google gmail spell checker as a > legitimate word! Niobium does! > >> Anyway, I think I finally understand how "magnetic viscosity" provides >> an unbalanced energy equation. It's "fast in, slow out". Can you >> make a magmo with it? Dunno. Experimenting. > > Good luck Terry! I am encouraged by your tentative speculation. In > theory it would seem like there could very well be an exploitable > imbalance introduced into the mixture - especially when rapid in-out > oscillations are introduced such as from a rapidly spinning rotor > assembly. > >> I understand the Steorn is (are) selling licenses for 10,000 (euros)? >> This gives access to the IP known as the SKDB. We are examining >> whether we will participate. >> >> Terry > > Regards > Steven Vincent Johnson > www.OrionWorks.com > www.zazzle.com/orionworks > >
