I considered that and more but IMO that moves from the realm of probability to debunking..
Given the evidence that both of these effects exist, both the electron being ejected and arcs creating excess energy it would seem to me that something should not be ruled out simply because some improbable chain of events could account for the results. (arc releases strong microwaves through shield that creates high voltages on metal that has oxide coating or other reason to prefer becoming charged and a bunch of people lied OR electrons are released) Sure, I'm not saying that is isn't a thought but it depends on if this possibility is considered to be a probability. Do you drop something because there is a chance it could be an error or do you continue the research to find out? Now the rest of the reason I believe it is electrons being ejected will be explained in another email when I have the time... On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to John Berry's message of Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:04:05 +1200: > Hi, > [snip] > >Also how can microwaves charge something with a static charge? > [snip] > This is just a guess, but consider that most metals have an oxide coating > due to > exposure to the air. The metal-oxide boundary may sometimes form a diode, > allowing for rectification of impinging microwaves, resulting in a charge > accumulation. > > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html > >
