Jed sez: > OrionWorks wrote: > > "Certainly, it is conceivable that Maddox had a few "assistants", > possibly playing their roles passively. But their "sins" are likely to > be more the "sins of omission" . . . > > What I think is far more alarming, perhaps even sinister, is the fact > that years ago certain financial analysts had already determined > (some, without a shadow of doubt) that what Maddox was doing HAD to be > blatantly illegal. . . ." > > Madoff, not Maddox. Maddox was the editor of Nature. He had plenty of > assistants, but what he did was perfectly legal. > > In the long view of history, Maddox and his cohorts caused much more harm > than Madoff, albeit unintentionally. They thought they were doing good. > > - Jed
Jeez! I even googled "maddox" and "ponzi scheme" together in an attempt to make sure I got the spellin cerrect. Upon closer inspection I now see Google changed the spellin to from"Maddox" to "Madoff". Once again I have been deceived, for my own good! -- Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
