On Aug 19, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:


On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:

www.physic.ut.ee/instituudid/efti/.../KuullaagerMootorAJP1978.pdf

The entire paper can be downloaded by clicking the link as it appears in
the search results.

It contains lots of math.

Harry


Thanks for that!

The URL is:

http://www.physic.ut.ee/instituudid/efti/loengumaterjalid/elmag/ KuullaagerMootorAJP1978.pdf

http://tinyurl.com/n6p5sc

It appears Gruenberg made exactly the same mistake I did. He forgot to account for conservation of angular momentum (COAM). His theory predicts the balls can produce self rotation without interaction with any external body. Since all the balls rotate about the same axis, namely the x axis in his paper, aligned with the axis of the shaft, a net angular momentum is continually conferred upon the balls and then, through friction, to the motor mount. My theory does exactly the same thing, except it also indicates similar (but canceling in the sum for the two raceways) self-forces developing in the raceways.

I already tested this possibility, that COAM is violated by the motor. I found it was COAM was not violated and therefore my theory was bogus. Here again is the test result:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Since the motor is a bit strange I decided today to do a quick test for conservation of angular momentum. I remounted the steel bearing motor vertically for the test, and spun it up with a Dremel tool, and started the power. The film says it all. No significant COAM violation. However, as the unit rotates a bit you get a view of the battery and makeshift splashguard and get to see the motor run fairly fast. Not much compensation for watching, I know! 8^)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OdBa8bZHl8

http://tinyurl.com/r7e5gu
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


After reflecting on this a while, and after much internal conflict and some further experimentation, I came to accept the inevitable conclusion that my theory was bogus, and posted so here.

Best regards,

Horace Heffner
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/




Reply via email to