-----Original Message----- From: Terry Blanton
>... But the phase one energy output of the H sample in the PZ is a real puzzler. And why the heck does it match the D? It is obviously non-nuclear in phase one. And since it is so rapidly energetic, as a practical matter, why wait for phase two? Doh ! > Is it something Casimir? Or is it an error? Since it cannot be reconciled with A-Z or with other findings, it is either an error ... or else it is the discovery of the decade (if it is not related to fractional hydrogen, since that would be an arguable explanation, were it not for the reversibility). > Listen to me, I sound like a skeptic. :-) Speaking of logical skepticism, the Dufour hypothesis would be the one to jump on. Or not. Others here on Vo - have mentioned or debated the fact that the gravity force must grow exponentially at close dimensions - IF - "grand unification" is accurate. I think it is accurate. Dufour puts some numbers to that hypothesis. He may be onto something. But here is an irony. We have often asked the rhetorical question: "if the Casimir 'force' is essentially negative, then how can it produce a net energy gain?" .... And now, with pico-gravity in the picture, we seems to have a tantalizing clue, in a reversed solution, so to speak. That being that the Casimir itself is NOT the active force of interest, but instead the Casimir is the "energy sink" for picogravity. Get it? Jones
