Michel Jullian wrote:
> Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? No. The authors are aware of this paper. It is really their work. > Or one would have to imagine that Focardi himself has been conned. Note > that multi-kW excess heat must be quite easy to fake in this > particular device, with its built-in heating resistor. For example, add > AC current of a higher frequency than the meter's bandwidth. > I do not think this method could make 80 W look like 3,000 W. Most meter have high bandwidth; I have never heard of high frequency AC adding more than a fraction of 1% to the total. You would have to design and build specialized equipment to put 97% of the electricity into the cell with high frequency AC. And as a practical matter, how would you do this? Sneak some equipment into the lab at night? Bribe a lab assistant? How would you keep Focardi from doing some elementary cross checking to find out? This sounds like something from a made-for-TV thriller. If there is a con involved, Focardi must be part of it. - Jed
