If they have equal shares in this work, why isn't Focardi on the patent? Michel
2010/3/15, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>: > Michel Jullian wrote: > > >> Then it can't be a Ni-H research discrediting operation can it? > > > No. The authors are aware of this paper. It is really their work. > > > >> Or one would have to imagine that Focardi himself has been conned. Note >> that multi-kW excess heat must be quite easy to fake in this >> particular device, with its built-in heating resistor. For example, add >> AC current of a higher frequency than the meter's bandwidth. >> > > I do not think this method could make 80 W look like 3,000 W. Most meter > have high bandwidth; I have never heard of high frequency AC adding more > than a fraction of 1% to the total. You would have to design and build > specialized equipment to put 97% of the electricity into the cell with high > frequency AC. And as a practical matter, how would you do this? Sneak some > equipment into the lab at night? Bribe a lab assistant? How would you keep > Focardi from doing some elementary cross checking to find out? This sounds > like something from a made-for-TV thriller. > > If there is a con involved, Focardi must be part of it. > > - Jed >
