fusion means to make two things one.  It is a much older term than
anything we use it to mean.  One could say that pouring water into a
pan and adding sugar, you have made a fusion of water and sugar.
"Nuclear" fusion is something different. You are being way to general,
it seems to be.

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:29 PM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
<svj.orionwo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From Alexander:
>
>> okay, this isnt a definition of Fusion youre looking for,
>> but a theory of how fusion works?
>
> I'm not looking for a specific theory of how fusion works.
>
> My original question was more in tune with what might be considered a
> sociological query: What does the term "fusion" define? Who owns the
> rights to use the term "fusion" within their theories? What specific
> ingredients must be present that will allow any theory safe-passage to
> commandeer the term "fusion" within its definition. I've wondered if
> in order for any and all "fusion" theories to be considered legitimate
> they must somehow show how they directly overcome the Coulomb barrier,
> such as by forcing their way past the Coulomb Barrier and into the
> nucleus of the atom via brute force, such as by thermonuclear fusion.
>
> But could the term "fusion" also be commandeered to explain other
> theoretical mechanisms? For example the utilization of Muons that Mr.
> Lomax mentioned. Muonic atoms are significantly smaller atomic
> species, and as such, make it theoretically possible to slip past the
> Coulomb Barrier because they remain neutrally charged during their
> brief life spans. I gather Mr. Lomax seems to think so. Seems like
> reasonable conjecture to me as well. I would imagine others might
> think muons, and/or possibly hydrinos (if they do exist) might be
> possible mechanisms as well.
>
>> Two different things my friend.
>
> Indeed they are two different things.
>
> BTW, I see Mr. Lomax has followed up with a detailed explanation
> pertaining to various theories involving "fusion". Thanks Abd. Much
> appreciated.
>
> I see Horace added a few thoughtful perceptions on the matter as well.
> Thanks Horace.
>
> Regards
> Steven Vincent Johnson
> www.OrionWorks.com
> www.zazzle.com/orionworks
>
>

Reply via email to