Robin, Yes, gas atoms do see themselves as totally normal inside the cavity, and time is accelerated by an enormous factor inversely proportional to the cube of the spacing between Casimir plates which act as a reservoir. The difficulty is our macro concept of equivalent acceleration may be hiding the scope of these forces at the smallest scales where time and space can transform with changes in energy density. The video by Jon Philips we discussed previously: http://www.youtube.com/user/audrip you replied that[snip]..so this guy has proven that he can read and understand Mills. ;) The bit about infinite electric fields is straight out of Mills. Regards,[/snip] .... Which I don't disagree with but in addition to his rehash, he also elaborates on how these opposing infinite fields overlap and mostly cancel out except for the very local space time between the physical matter associated with these infinite fields. What we see at the macro scale may only represent a small shadow of these forces after they cancel and average to a tiny bias we describe as gravity/equivalent acceleration. My point being that accelerations, although negative, might be on a scale we normally associate with black holes and have time dilations up to the 1E80 to 1E100 year challenge of tunneling. As for slowing or accelerating we aren't talking spatial acceleration but rather equivalent acceleration contributed by the plates and that acceleration is negative forming a gravity hill vs a gravity well. If we outside the cavity are the reference point then we would appear to be accelerated to near luminal velocity relative to the hydrogen inside the cavity. It ages greatly from our perspective but instead of us returning from a spaceship to earth, it is the hydrogen returning to our inertial frame from a negative equivalent acceleration inside the cavity - I won't say deceleration because we tend to think of deep space as the zero reference and the cavity is using the reservoir to create a venturi negative to that reference.
Regards Fran -----Original Message----- From: mix...@bigpond.com [mailto:mix...@bigpond.com] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 9:29 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR In reply to francis 's message of Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:08:10 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Robin, > > I like the idea of reacting with clusters but you know my >bias toward a relativistic solution where those clusters see themselves as >normal h2 while from our perspective they appear greatly accelerated and >much smaller If they appeared smaller from our external perspective, but not from their own internal perspective then they should see themselves as separated by the normal distance and the reaction rate would be the same. IOW tunneling would take 1E80 to 1E100 years. To make that happen in ordinary time from our point of view you would need to speed time up by a vast factor. [snip] Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
