Peter, I like what you have to say. I have been dealing with transformations
and
cold fusion for a little while now and I understand there are some simple
ground
rules and basic understandings that have to be adhered to. People just don't go
onto the public platform with bogus claims anymore.
Your understanding is on track and I for one appreciate your input.
DVD
________________________________
From: Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, January 15, 2011 10:01:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A new energy source from nuclear fusion, S Focardi, A Rossi,
9p text 2010.03.22: Rich Murray 2011.01.14
As far I know, absolutely nobody agrees with me. It seems my thinking is
special
as explained at my blog's first page.
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Removing those poisons is a "sine qua non" condition for CF, a necessary
>> condition but it is not sufficient.
>
>I must admit, it certainly explains many issues including
>reproducibility of experiments. Does Dennis Cravens concur that it
>was laser ablation of impurities which enhanced initiation?
>
>Congratulations, by the way, to you and all LENR researchers.
>
>Terry
>
>
